Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Cultural Variation - Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg - Coggle Diagram
Cultural Variation - Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg
Findings
Secure attachment was found to be the most common
Insecure resistant was the least common
Found a greater variety of attachments types within cultures
In American studies, secure attachment percentages were 90% and in others 45%
Investigated cross-cultural attachment types through a meta-analysis of research
Compared studies using the Strange Situation in different cultures for population validity
32 studies from 8 countries
AO3
Simonella (2014)
Lower secure attachment because mothers work long hours and use childcare
Prior and Glaser (2006)
Core concepts are universal
McMahon-True et al. (2001)
Dogon culture - children are cared for by grandmothers, positive correlations between maternal sensitivity and infant security ratings (no instances of avoidant)
Lewis (2005)
Attachment theory focuses too much on western tools
Aboriginal children are reared by many women which creates a ‘safe network’
Rothbaum et. al (2000)
Set of universal principles, childcare practices should be related to cultural values
Attachment is too American