PIPER ALPHA
Event Sequence
The diesel and electric saltwater pumps were switched from automatic to manual control as it was found they may prove hazardous if they were activated whilst platform divers were in the water. These pumps fed the platforms on-board fire-fighting system from the ocean
System parts
System life cycle
People
Workplaces
Nightshift staff were unable to restart the primary condensate pump after it tripped out. The spare condensate pump was re-commissioned to restart operations when it was under maintenance
Spare condensate pump/valves were removed for a large overhaul and was additional work to what was initially scheduled for maintenance
Piper Alpha Platform
Staff
Diesel Module
Additional Accommodation West
Quarters West
Deck Support Frame
Condensate Pump A
Condensate Pump B
A Module (Wellheads)
B Module (Oil Separation)
C Module (Gas Compression)
D Module (Electrical & Facilities)
Helideck
SPEE Module
Sub Module D
Pods Module
Storage Module
Mud Module
Drilling Rig
SW Flare Boom
SE Flare Boom
Pipeline terminations
Pig Traps
Cranes
East
West
Control Room
Construction
De-commissioning
Maintenance
Commissioning
Operation
Concept Detailed Design
Servicing
Drilling line maintenance
Wire rope maintenance
Mud circulating system
Generator, electrical systems and electric motors
Engines
Rig floor
Rotary
Inspections
Adjustments & amendements
Catheads
Tongs
Wire rope
Drawworks
Air hoists
Hoses
Hose connections
Pop-off values
Shale shakers
Belts
Guards
Mud pumps
Replacement parts
Derrick equipment maintenance
Travelling block
Swivel packing replacement
Crown block
Swivel
Platform removal
Explosive and mechanical techniques sever jacket below seafloor
Ultimate placement of material in landfill or limited recycling
Break-up of large pieces of metal and concrete to demolish installations
Impact on fishes and invertebrates beneath platform
Seafloor returned to its unobstructed pre-lease condition
Conversion of decommissioned gas and oil platforms can be turned into particular reefs. In the Gulf of Mexico, as much as 11% of platforms have been converted into reef (Bull & Love 2019)
Testing
Platform installation
Hell deck
Top deck
Quarters
Power generation
Drilling rig
Crane
Flare boom
Production equipment
Management
Organisational factors
Job design
Information transfer
Team factors
Individual factors
Workplace factors
Equipment design
Work environment
Piper Alpha was an oil platform located approximately 120 miles north-east of Aberdeen, Scotland in the North Sea. The platform later added gas and condensate production. A series of explosions broke out before the platform was engulfed in fire killing 167 people on the 6-7 July 1988
Due to work policies, the contractors working on the large overhaul paused the job at 6pm to complete the next morning which made the pump maintenance incomplete
Due to workload, the contractors were unable to speak to the operations manager directly to explain the work was incomplete and the permit-to-work system (on additional works) so they left it on the manger's desk
Operations manager was unaware that the contractors did additional works on the spare pumps/valves that was not completed
Condensate began to leak at the point where relief valve had been removed from maintenance works
Gas alarms in the control room started to sound to warn leaking gas in low lying areas that indicated propane
Leaking condensate ignited causing an explosion in the gas compression module. Various firewalls and communication equipment was destroyed
Communication equipment was destroyed in explosion
A gas pipe carrying compressed gas from the other two platforms burst causing explosion and gas fire
Oil fire was ignited causing toxic black smoke
The pipeline that connects Piper Alpha and the claymore platform bursts
Module (D), including the fireproofed accommodation block, slips into the sea
Handover of information was inadequate between shifts, crew and disciplines
No communication between the contractors and management to discuss the unfinished work & removal of the spare condensate pump/valves
Organisational Systems/Management and Regulations
Operational conversion (oil to gas)
Extensive modifications required due to afterthought to introduce export of gas
The new facility was located right beside accommodation modules, radio room, under the electrical power and beside the control room which caused a disastrous situation
Operational Routine
To activate the fire-fighting system, the pumps had to be started locally
Organisational Safety Procedures
When the fire broke out, the pumps had to be started locally to activate the fire-fighting
The suspended work permits were not displayed in the control room but in the safety office
Permits in the safety office were filed by trade and not by location
The gas and condensate operational elements were not included in the design plans therefore it could only manage the safety of the gas production
The permit to work system relied heavily on informal communication
While bespoke communications can have some benefits, minimum standards were not set or met.
Training
If a newcomer had worked offshore before, then training was brief to the point of non-existent
Training
Incoming crews were supposed to be given safety induction training by the safety department
Safety culture
The safety induction was too simplistic. Staff were handed booklet and told to read it, much of the information was out of date or inapplicable to Piper Alpha
Organisational systems
Shift changeovers
At shift changeover lead production operators would not review or discuss suspended permits
Operators were busy with their own handovers at the shift change on the day
The explosions caused a loss of command, control and electrical power among the platform, leaving the system essentially decapitated
Financial pressures
Rigs were all interconnected and not individual
Contract rigger killed in an accident a few years prior
Prior warnings regarding issues with the organisations low quality safety management systems long before the accident
Safety culture complacency and everything is fine attitude
Personal safety over process safety eg. fire water pumps on manual start to protect divers
Managers on board the platform had minimal training
which resulted in poor practices and ineffective audits
Policies and procedures
Impairment of performance and inability to complete maintenance before shift changeover could be attributed to tiredness from long shifts
Emergency response procedures
Management viewed safety training as “cursory” and did not train new workers in emergency responses. Witnesses reported that some workers were not shown where the lifeboats were on the platform
Emergency procedures that existed, did not account for any catastrophic events, such as the one that destroyed the platform
Due to display of non-critical alarm sounds and signals coming from the detector module rack, the gas alarms sounding in the control room were not acknowledged by the operator as associated with gas hazard alarms
The platform was never upgraded to be equipped with emergency response mechanisms for gas situations; therefore the firewalls were never upgraded to withstand gas-related fires and explosions of that nature
Communications between the platforms were lost when the first explosions occurred. This delayed shut-down on the other platforms, particularly on Claymore and Tartan.
Equipment was challenging to control during the emergency as there was a lack of redundancy controls
The primary emergency evaluation method was via helicopters and boats and no other transportation method was included.
Supervisors/Management
Management of Piper Alpha viewed emergency training as 'cursory' and did not account for catastrophic events including the one that destroyed the platform
Teams on other platforms surrounding Piper Alpha continued to pump oil to it even though it was visibly on fire
Safety advisor signed off Permit to Work without inspecting the job site where routine maintenance was being conducted
There was no mention of the works being conducted on the Condensate Pump A in the maintenance logs
Inadequacies in the layout of the platform as there was only one access route to the lifeboats and this was obstructed with thick black smoke from the explosions
Attitudes
Work ethic among the platform had disintegrated; with workers only working to complete tasks before changeovers
Long shifts for the workers on the platform could have attributed to poor performance when undertaking maintenance activities
Control room operators did not believe they had the authority to cease productions and stop pumping oil
Macleod et al. (2018) states that when people are encouraged to think that safety can be ensured by roles that are enforced by inspectors, they become complacent and it is impossible to cover eventualities in a set of general rules
Highlighted inadequacies of both the permit to work and the shift handover procedures however nothing was changed
Main evacuation was via helicopter (helideck as it was believed to be the last place to be damaged if an accident occurred). Within the first minute of the explosion, the helideck was covered in black smoke
Roles and responsbilities
Management were reluctant to shut down the operations onboard
Superintendent in the control room did not believe he had the authority to stop the exportation processes from the platform
Management in the surrounding platforms did not believe they had authority to stop the constant supply from their platforms
Discrepancies between what the safety department intended to convey, and what they actually conveyed
Lack of adherence to the standard operating procedures associated with the PTW system
Procedure required maintenance and operations to meet, inspect the work site and sign off permits together however did not occur on the day of the accident
Some staff didn't know the location of the lifeboats
Some staff did not know the location of the lifeboats therefore it hindered their escape when the explosions began
Operators kept a log but often failed to record maintenance activities
Shift handover was a busy time
Procedure if management were busy was for maintenance to sign off the work permit and leave it in the control room or safety office
Contractors & maintenance personnel
Workers/Operators
No one received accurate training as they did not challenge management's viewers that emergency training was cursory
The previous shift supervisors failed to communicate to the supervisor on the consecutive shift that there was ongoing maintenance being conducted on Condensate Pump A
Due to a number of other non-critical alarms constantly sounding, the operators ignored the gas alarms that were sounding in the control room
The assessment of risk was focused on turning off the pumps to protect divers from being sucked into pipes instead of prioritising the 226 men unprotected from fire
Oil continued to be produced and exported into the line to for approximately an hour after the first explosion
Operators were busy with their own handovers at the shift change on the day
Superintendent in the control room did not believe he had the authority to stop the exportation processes from the platform
The control room operators did not believe they had the authority to cease productions and stop pumping oil to Piper Alpha due to a lack of command among platforms
The deluge nozzles were often blocked with scale and the fire-water pipework was undergoing phased replacement
The platform was underperforming operationally after an inspection was conducted on the safety equipment
The oil from Claymore and Titan took the easier reverse route to Piper Alpha because the emergency shutdown valve on the Piper Alpha oil export line failed to close tightly
Retrofitting was in several phases - separation of condensate and then production of export-quality gas
Retrofitting causes non-ideal design solutions to make it work
The location of the control room next to the oil and gas production modules had a high probability of destroying the control room and created high failure dependencies if any fires and blasts occurred
Safety design rested (fire) was not revisited effectively when the platform was modified to treat gas with additional risk of explosion.
When the fire and black smoke broke out, no workers could get to the helipad
No way of contacting the surrounding platforms to cease their supplies to the platform
The lack of communication system redundancies when these were destroyed during initial explosions
Main escape route for emergencies not sufficient
Not accurately updated to suit new operational requirements eg. gas
The pressure relief valves for the condensate injection pumps were located one floor above the pumps
In order to reinstate condensate injection pump A, two separate actions would have been required: reinstate electrical power and open the gas-operated suction and discharge valves
Valve should be placed as close to condensate unit as possible however it was placed 8 metres above and 15 metres away from the pump
No locking of isolation valves, spading or double-block-and-bleed were used to prevent re-pressurisation of a system isolated for maintenance
Some parts used to refurbish for installation at another location
Onboard facilities
Function
Can be 200 people working and living on a rig at one time
Onboard wifi
Accommodation quarters
Television
Small movie theatres, pool tables, air hockey, video game consoles on some rigs
Operator skills & requirements
Complete sea survival training
Medical examinations
Helipad
Used to fly in hundreds of workers constantly via helicopters
Oil rig operational 24 hours a day
Approx. 90 min turnaround on flight
Music rooms
Laundry
Kitchen
Sometimes fire rooms/own fire fighting crew
Poorly ventilated modules where equipment was located
Most workers were sleeping in the accommodation quarters where the explosion occurred due to fire which was located close to the explosion
Controls
Automated drilling system
Integrated drilling controls system
Equipment integration
Drilling control rooms
Data Mate System (DMS)
Management were reluctant to shut down operations onboard after the first explosion
No identification of the risks associated with loosely fitting the blind flange
Did not inform management of unfinished works or additional maintenance work was undergone
Maintenance log not filled in
No out of order signs/tag out on pump undergoing maintenance
Management would assume that if no issues were reported by crew then they did not independently review operations or the Permit to Work system
Not trained in emergency evacuation procedures
Left works for the following day instead of delegating the task
Fire-fighting systems were not activated when fires began as it was turned to manual control
Emergency and safety procedures not practiced on the platform
Workers were constantly exposing themselves to fatal levels of smoke as they constantly opened and closed the door to the crew quarters
The Piper Alpha platform did not have an adequate refuge area and refuge system
Due to a lack of emergency training, the workers seeking refuge in the crew quarters were constantly opening and closing the doors; exposing themselves to fatal levels of the smoke from the explosions.
The workers onboard the platform at the time of the emergency began to seek shelter in the crew quarters. Due to a lack of emergency training, the workers seeking refuge in the crew quarters were constantly opening and closing the doors; exposing themselves to fatal levels of the smoke from the explosions
Processing equipment and utilities tested onshore and pre-commissioned where possible
Hydrotesting of pressurised gas tests and pipework (1% helium and nitrogen for trace for detection)
Onshore hydrotesting of the topside performed with potable water
Vessels fire fighting systems
Analysis required
Fatigue analysis
In-place analysis
Earthquake analysis
Installation analysis
Transportation analysis
Upending analysis
Appurtenances analysis
Loadout analysis
Impact analysis
Stability analysis
Pile and conductor pipe drivability analysis
Environmental perimeters
Helicopter landing pads/decks must conform to legislation
Wave height analysis
Water depth
Wind velocities
Tide analysis
Minimum air gaps between decks
Load weight of onboard equipment
Geotechnical perimeters
Seabed soil mixture eg. sand, clay, silt
Load bearing of tension and compression
Sheer resistances
Load-deflection characteristics
Various
Accommodation allocation
Transportation
On board a vessel
Built in fabrication yards
Stresses checked
Seafastening analysis is performed
Platform parts (decks, jackets, appurtenances fastened to barge
Motions of heave, pitch, roll and yaw is considered
Seastate analysis compare with worst of the year
Installation
Structural sections must be able to withstand upending, uprighting and lifting/launching and other stresses
Jackets are self supporting during pile drive and installation
Safety features and emergency provisions eg. lifeboats
Materials used
Layout of rig
Design Failure
Active Failure - Information Transfer
Precursor - Failure to investigate - Management/Systems
Design Flaw – Precondtion
Change Management Procedures – Latent Failure
Management/Organisational Failure
Active Failure - Management/Organisational
Management Policies/Procedures – Precursor
Active failure to ensure procedure was followed – information transfer
Management/Organisational – Latent Failure
Inadequate management policy/procedure – Latent failure
Inadequate management policy/procedure – Latent failure
Management/Organisational – Latent Failure
Active failure –Management/information transfer
Management/Organisational – Latent Failure
Active failure to ensure procedure was followed – information transfer
Inadequate instruction/information transfer – pre-condition
Equipment Design Failure
Equipment Design Failure
Change Management Procedures – Latent Failure
Design failure to ensure emergency systems were failsafe
Inadequate instruction/information transfer – pre-condition
Change Management Procedures – Latent Failure
Latent Failure – Management/Systems
Design Failure
Design Flaw – Precondtion
Design failure to ensure emergency systems were failsafe & Latent Failure - Management/Systems
Inadequate instruction/information transfer – pre-condition
Management Policies/Procedures – Precursor
Inadequate management policy/procedure – Latent failure
Pre-cursor – Failure to investigation – Management/systems
Inadequate instruction/information transfer – pre-condition
Active failure – information transfer
Inadequate management policy/procedure – Latent failure
Active Failure to ensure systems were failsafe & Design Flaw - Precondition
Active failure to ensure procedure was followed – information transfer
Management/Organisational – Latent Failure
Inadequate instruction/information transfer – pre-condition
Active failure – information transfer
Active Failure to ensure systems were failsafe
Design Failure
Wilkinson et al. (2000) discusses the operation of critical alarms and the need to consider staffing levels and work loading conditions through unforeseeable conditions like normal, through upset, shutdown, start-up and emergency. The alarm systems can only operate effectively if those factors are taken into consideration in the design process including shift lengths, fatigue factors and operational training
Skohdalen et al. (2012) explains the requirement of extensive installation, evacuation, escape and rescue (EER) operations for safeguarding the lives of personnel onboard offshore drilling rigs. The requirement to design the platform to have numerous different escape methods and specific placement of lifeboats across the rig has been shown in major accidents in history. Helicopter evacuation cannot be used as the primary method in situations involving fire, gas and smoke.
Marsden (2019) states that earlier audits of the automatic firefighting system (both electric and diesel seawater pumps) recommended that this should not be disabled while diving operations were underway as this presents major hazards in the case of an emergency.
Chao et al. (2003) states that the use of root-cause analysis, failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) can provide comprehensive predictions of future errors and casual factors from comparisons of historical errors. If these prior warnings would be have been acknowledged, management would have identified areas where the safety management system was lacking.
Quality Inspections
Rig inspections
Drill pipe inspection/tubular inspection
Non-destructive testing (NDT techniques)
Mobile hard banding
Materials
Nickel based alloys
Titanium alloys
Duplex & martensitic stainless steel
Bull, A & Love, M 2019, ‘Worldwide oil and gas platform decommissioning: A review of practices and reefing options’, Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 168, no. 1, pp. 274-306
Chao, L & Ishii, K 2003, Design process error-proofing: Development of automated error-proofing information systems, paper presented at ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 2-6 September, viewed 13 August 2020, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267198001_Design_Process_Error-Proofing_Development_of_Automated_Error-Proofing_Information_Systems
Copello, S n.d, Life-cycle assessment of offshore platforms, viewed 10 September 2020, http://www.aiom.info/documentsfordownloads/STUDI_AIOM_GENOVA_2015/presentazioni/sessione3/copello.pdf
Craig, B 2008, ‘Materials for deep oil and gas well construction’, Advanced Materials and Processes, vol. 166, no. 5, pp. 33-35
Deniz, S 2013, Environmental & socio-economic drilling rig impact assessment, viewed 11 September 2020, https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/country-sites/en_az/azerbaijan/home/pdfs/esias/sd/sd2/5_project_description.pdf
Macleod, F & Richardson, S 2018, Piper Alpha: The disaster in detail, viewed 11 September 2020, https://www.thechemicalengineer.com/features/piper-alpha-the-disaster-in-detail/
Marsden, E 2019, The Piper Alpha disaster, viewed 13 September 2020, https://risk-engineering.org/concept/PiperAlpha
Occupational Safety and Health Administration n.d, Maintenance activities, viewed 11 September 2020, https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/oilandgas/drilling/maintenance_activities.html
Onshore Operations Subgroup 2011, ‘Life cycle of onshore oil and gas operations’, The National Petroleum Council North American Resource Development Study viewed 10 September 2020, https://www.npc.org/Prudent_Development-Topic_Papers/2-26_Life_Cycle_of_Onshore_Operations_Paper.pdf
Sadeghi, K 2007, ‘An overview of design, analysis, construction and installation of offshore petroleum platforms suitable for cyprus oil/gas fields’ Offshore Platforms, viewed 12 September 2020, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229036270_An_Overview_of_Design_Analysis_Construction_and_Installation_of_Offshore_Petroleum_Platforms_Suitable_for_Cyprus_OilGas_Fields
Skogdalen, J, Khorsandi, J & Vinnem, J 2012, ‘Evacuation, escape, and rescue experiences from offshore accidents including the Deepwater Horizon’, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 148-158
Wilkinson, J & Lucas, D 2000, Better alarm handling - a practical application of human factors, paper presented at IBC Alarms Conference, June, viewed 11 September 2020, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/002029400203500204