Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
That we should all be implanted with identity chips - AGAINST Human…
That we should all be implanted with identity chips - AGAINST
Human Microchip Impantation
Physical Health Issues from Implant
Impact of chips on the body
radiation
interference with other medical treatments?
replacement hardware
How often
expense
who provides service
security leaks?
bodily migration
Can they move around the body?
Affect other medical devices?
Unpredictable outcomes
How will the brain respond?
Advocacy around privacy violations
People living with disabilities
people that are unaware of their rights/no support
temporary medical conditions inhibit cognitive understanding
Privacy
Government/Corporate control over personal data
Advertising/political agendas
Elon Musk "superhuman cognition"
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-53987919
Corporate Responsibility
Corporate responsibility is legislated by a company's own social responsibility codes and alliances
Australian Privacy Laws -
"one of the weakest data privacy regimes in the Western world."
Physical tracking
invasive governments
domestic violence
Abuse of power from government agencies giving real time information
Human Rights
Participation Discrimination
Social or participation issues
Will people be excluded from participation in events/institutions
Will social status be an issue around designer/fashionable chips
Financial
Discriminated against people that have to access cheaper/public technology options
Dignity of Risk v Duty of Care
Personal Freedoms
Fear around free speech - will dissidents be tracked or face exclusion
choices around experimentation - drugs/alcohol, minor crimes. Will these "rights of passage" be monitored/recorded and used to discriminate further against vulnerable members of the community
Choices around participation in events - Right of assembly
Will microchips be used to monitor duty of care over dignity of risk - tracking
discrimination of medical history
medical history can be stored and accessed easily on chips
discrimination against people with mental health issues, people with disability etc
Choosing who receives services from support workers - leaving high risk patients without support
‘Dignity of risk’ refers to the concept of affording a person the right (or dignity) to take reasonable risks, and that the impeding of this right can suffocate personal growth, self-esteem and the overall quality of life (Ibrahim & Davis 2013)
Consent
Chips being planted when other surgeries are being conducted?
objectifying humans
Chips were originally designed for stocktaking of assets
systems in place are designed for objects - people become numbers
Workers Rights
Tracking movements in the workplace
lower morale and productivity. Feeling spied on
Tracking outside of work
used to discriminate against lifestyle choices
Monitoring how workers spend their time outside work
discrimination against people with mental health issues in hiring/promotion/work allocation
Chips can be reprogrammed whilst inside body
chips can be used for purposes not initially agreed to in workplace contracts
Religious Institution
Will people be excluded for using chips?
social isolation
moral guidance
financial support
Legislation
Universal standard for protection and usage
International
Legal Ramifications in the US
what levels of government should these chips be legislated
Federal
State
Local
corporate laws stifle innovation
No coverage under constitutions for corporate behaviour
Identity Theft
What would the punishment be
Who would be responsible in acting on this
what level of Government?
Corporate responsibility?
International Cooperation?
Definition in law
What information should be placed on a device to be able to identify a person
Who would have access to the personal information
Who would be able to read the information with a scanner