Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
REMOTENESS (Type of harm (Narrow view, Tremain v Pike
No liability under…
REMOTENESS
Type of harm
-
Tremain v Pike
No liability under remoteness; the injury by biting was reasonably foreseeable but not that specific disease 
-
Bradford v Robinson Rentals
Some injury was reasonably foreseeable due to no heating and broken windows; it did not matter that the exact form of injury was not foreseeable
Corr v IBC
It was foreseeable that C would develop depression as a result of the accident therefore C's suicide was foreseeable
Page v Smith
'it is whether D can reasonably foresee that his conduct will expose C to the risk of personal injury whether physical or psychiatric' - Lord Lloyd
-
-
-
-
-