Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Philosophy (Descartes (we are unique beings with rational nature (strive…
Philosophy
-
Locke
felt that reason must be supplemented with experience if it is to provide us with knowledge and a needed foundation
empiricist belief- in making a knowledge claim, we shouldn't ignore experience
-
-
Kant
-
-
human progress is tied to reason and science, not feeling
-
the mind is creative and constructs its picture of the world, not a passive register of realistic pictures of the world
all human minds think in terms of the same basic innate categories, so all humans are substantially alike
culture and language are at the surface, and underneath, human beings worldwide share the same shaping rational nature
Hume
-
-
"Reason is, and ought only to be, the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them"
key modern assumption: an individual's beliefs and desires are formed prior to the internalization of language, and that language is merely a tool used to express thoughts that have already been formed
Romantic Modernists
influenced by emergence of oppressive factory production, miserable workhouses, and big-city slums
social problems stemmed from the influence of a repressive and corrupting civilization that turned human beings away from their natural compassion for others
humans now forced to live under artificial social order, so they begin to ignore their natural goodness
insisted the highest and most needed truths are subjective, and that these truths can be discovered only through intuition and feeling, not reason
-
reason identified with repression, artificiality, and moral corruption (not freedom, truth, and moral progress)
Nietzche
humans are not rational mirrors of nature, but wills to power, and want to increase their control over the world (not locate truth)
humans are like a stomach- an organ always trying to appropriate and absorb what is different from itself, trying to make the foreign familiar
rather than being passive, find greatest pleasure in digesting/transforming its surroundings
-
-
language, history, and the ability to create new worlds separates us from other power-seeking animals (not ability to find truth)
all thought is linguistic, and language shapes how humans think about the world
-
no rational progression in human thought, just change in perspectives
-
humans want to be an objective mirror, a bleached out, passive thing that merely reflects rather than makes the world (but what happened to being a stomach??)
-
Rorty
-
"knowledge" isn't a belief acquired through a direct confrontation between what's in the mind and what's in nature- "knowledge" is determined by conversation (???)
What is truth?
-
but it's impossible to determine if a belief or description accurately represents the world since it exists independent of thought
ex. "the sky is blue"
-
to determine, I must slip outside mind and language
two factors involved when thinking about truth- the linguistic description I think in, and the outside world
not denying that something exists, but that it doesn't make sense to talk about something else and describe it as truth
one's true self- can never figure out, but just encounter various descriptions we have faith in
When human beings come together, it is because of an imaginative description of Us and the Other (what is the other??? p.38)
we will only reduce our cruelty if we face it, important for us to redescribe things in order to change how we view it
Branches of Philosophy
-
-
-
Philosophical Reasoning
Tripartite Soul
-
-
Appetitive/Physical Desires- drives us to eat, have sex, and protect ourselves
How to Argue
Species of Arguments (Deductive, Inductive, Abductive, Argument by Analogy, Reductio Ad Absurdum)
-
Utilitarianism
-
-
-
-
thought experiment- killing one person vs letting 20 die- if we can do something to make things better, we must, even if that means getting our hands dirty
-
Rule Utilitarianism
we ought to live by rules that, in general, are likely to lead the the greatest good fo the greatest number
thought experiment- surgeon whose neighbor is a nobody, is an organ donor match for 5 people- should he kill his neighbor?
-
-