Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Leadership, power and status (SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS v.s. SELFISHNESS…

- - - - 80% of food storers had social status
      - 7% of non-food storers had social status
    - - Social levelling (problem): luxury goods within reach of everyday folk
      - Conspicuous consumption (solution): art, music, literature- -expensive but not useful
- - - - Education
      - Prestige of profession
      - Wealth/income
      - All correlated
  - - - Lower class participant gave away more points to a stranger in a sharing game
    - - DV: helping confederate to complete tasks (allocating longer tasks to self = prosocial behaviour)
        
        Compassion: everyone was primed to be compassionate
        
        Control: high class were more selfish
  - - - Watch how much engaged in traffic violations
      - Assumptions from make of car
      - High status = more likely to engage in violations
    - - Lie to a job candidate (mediated by greed)
      - Cheating in recording score on a die rolling game (mediated by greed)
      - Take candy that would otherwise go to children
      - Greed is good VS neutral increased reported propensity to engage in unethical behaviour at work (eg. stealing, overcharging, receive bribes)
  - - - Avoid paying fare on public transport
      - Cheat on taxes
      - Claiming government benefits that you are not entitled to
      - Accept a bribe
- - - - Democratic
        
        Friendly, group-centred, task-oriented
        
        Relatively high productivity (unaffected by presence or absence of leader)
        
        Liked more
      - Laissez-faire
        
        Friendly, group-centred, play-oriented
        
        Low productivity: increased in absence of leader
        
        Liked less
      - Autocratic
        
        Aggressive, dependent, self-orientated
        
        High productivity (leader present), low productivity (leader absent)
        
        Liked less
- - - - Likely to constrain their behaviour and attend to others carefully
        
        Higher concern about others/more inhibitied
        
        Withdraw from group interactions
        
        inhibit speech
        
        Less expressive behaviour
        
        Constrict their posture
        
        Vigilant & less flexible in shifting attention; eg) poorer on Stroop task
    - - Inclined to go after their goals and make quick judgements
      - Less concerned about others
        
        Less empathy
        
        Sexually assertive
        
        Less accurate at judging others' emotions
        
        Antisocial behaviour
      - Less careful with decisions
        
        Rely on race and sex stereotypes when judging others
    - - Write letter E for the perspective of other people