Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Cognitive errors & biases in social judgement (SOCIAL INFERENCE…
Cognitive errors & biases in social judgement
SOCIAL INFERENCE
Theory driven
: top-down
Confirmation Bias
Tendency to seek out info that supports our beliefs; while ignoring disconfirming info
Wason (1960) "Discover the rule applying to 3 number sequences
Told: 2-4-6 fits the rule
Actual rule: any ascending sequence
S seemed to test only positive examples; sequences that obeyed their hypothesised rule
80% convinced themselves of the wrong rule
Belief Perseverance
Once 'belief' + 'rationale' is formed = difficult to demolish
Purpose
Make social judgements & form impressions -->
sampling, identifying and combining information
Everyday inference = t
heory driven
& consists of
heuristics
Useful:
Quick inferences about complex social stimuli
However
:
Inaccuracies & shortcomings can occur
Can be reduced by rational & scientific thinking
Implications for the genesis & persistence of superstition
HEURISTICS
Types of thinking
Type 1
Unconscious
Automatic
Fast
Everyday
Error-prone
Examples
Read text on sign
Drive car on empty road
Solve 2+2
Understand simple sentences
Disgust at gory image
Complete; "war and ___"
Type 2
Effortful
Complex
Conscious
Reliable
Slow
Examples
Park in a tight space
Dig into a memory to recognise sound
Solve 14 x 17
Determine validity of complex logical reasoning
Determine appropriateness of behaviour in a social setting
Count number of 'a's in a text
Heuristics
Counter-factual thinking
Mentally stimulating "what might have been"
Near misses/wins are more cognitively available; influence our experience of regret, frustration, relief
Eg. Bronze vs silver, missing plane by 5 or 20 mins
Anchoring & Adjustment Heuristic
Biased towards an irrelevant starting value/anchor in making quantitative judgements
Chance of war greater than 1%? (25%) Chance of war less than 90%? (45%)-
DV = estimate chance of war; provides an anchor
Availability Heuristic
Judge frequency of an event: how easy it is to think of examples
Eg. Plane crash likelihood, More words starting with 'r' (rate) or have 'r' as third letter (farm)
Regression to the mean
Often attribute meaning to this fluctuation
Seeking treatment: @ lowest, feeling better: attributed to treatment
Extreme observtations followed by moderate obervatoins
Representative Heuristic
How close match typical average member of the that category
Neglect base rate information
Time-saving mental shortcut; reduced complex judgements to simple rules of thumb