Research Methods
While descriptive statistics are used by a researcher to organise, summarise and describe data, inferential statistics are used by a researcher to interpret the data and make inferences from observations of a sample in an experiment to generalise to a wider population.
Participant Selection: Participant selection involves the way in which potential subjects are chosen to participate in psychological research.
Stratified Sampling: Represents the general population on a certain characteristic. This prevents bias in the sample and enables the researcher to generalise the findings to the wider population.
In some experiments, the sample needs to be chosen to represent the general population on a certain characteristic, e.g. gender or age. Therefore, the researcher makes sure that the proportion of people in the sample with the particular characteristic is the same as the proportion of people in the general population with that characteristic.
When subjects within each stratum are selected in a random way, it is called a stratified random sample. This method prevents biases in the sample and enables the researcher to generalise the findings to the wider population.
Random Sampling: This involves the selection of subjects in such a way, that each has an equal opportunity to be chosen as a participant in the experiment. A number of methods can be chosen such as: picking names out of a hat or choosing every third person on an alphabetical list.
Ensures that subjects have an equal opportunity to be chosen as participants in the experiment. Usually, yields a fairly representative result.
If the sample is large enough, random sampling usually yields a fairly representative result.
Participation Allocation: Participant allocation involves the way in which subjects are assigned to the various conditions in a study.
Dependent Variable (DV): This is the variable which is being observed in the experimental situation to see the effect of the independent variable. Think of it as the outcome or results of both the experimental and control groups.
Control Group: The group of subjects which is matched in all ways possible with the subject characteristics and conditions of the experimental group except that it is not exposed to the independent variable. This group serves as a baseline measure for comparison with the experimental group. The control group helps the researcher to determine if the independent variable did, in fact, cause an effect on the dependent variable.
Independent Variable (IV): This is the variable that is manipulated or varied by the experimenter. It is applied to the experimental group and is known as the cause of the results.
Experimental Group: The group of subjects which is matched in all ways possible with the subject characteristics and conditions of the control group but is also exposed to the independent variable.
The purpose of the experimental group is to provide a measure of the influence in the dependent variable produced by the intervention.
Placebo Effect: A placebo effect is when there are changes in the subjects' behaviour caused by the belief that they received an active drug or treatment when, in fact, the drug was a neutral substance. This inert or neutral 'treatment' is called a placebo and is used to equalise the expectations of the control and experimental groups.
For example, if you wanted to test the effects of a new drug which was supposed to improve memory, you could have two groups. The experimental group would be given the drug in tablet form and the control group would be given tablets that looked the same as those received by the experimental group, except that they contained glucose (a placebo). Both groups would then be tested on a memory task. In this experiment, the subjects feel that they have been treated equally and any difference in the groups would most likely be due to the drug.
In another experiment, three groups could be tested where group one was given the drug, group two, a placebo, and group three nothing. If the results of groups one and two were very similar and much higher than group three, then this is an example of a placebo effect.
Experimenter Effect: This is the way in which an experimenter might influence the outcome of an experiment without realising that he or she is doing so. In order to minimise subject or experimenter effects, researchers design single and double-blind experiments.
Double-blind: In a double-blind experiment, the data collection is carried out by a third party who is told what to do but has no knowledge of the expected outcomes or which group is which.
Thus neither the subjects nor the experimenter can bias the experiment.
Single-blind: In a single-blind experiment, the subjects do not know whether they are in the control group or experimental group condition.
This prevents the subjects' knowledge or expectations of the experiment impacting on the results.
In any experiment, the goal of the researcher is to be able to confidently conclude that the observed effect was caused by the independent variable alone. However, the difficulty arises when the dependent variable can be influenced by variables other than the independent variable.
Variables, other than the independent variable, which may influence the dependent variable are called extraneous variables. Extraneous variables have the effect of confounding the results in an experiment and the researcher can no longer draw conclusions regarding the causal relationship that exists between the independent variable and the dependent variable.
In order to minimise the effects of extraneous variables, researchers may choose the following experimental designs:
Matched-subjects Design: As well as utilising a repeated-measures design to minimise the effects of extraneous variables, researchers often choose to conduct a matched-subjects design. A matched-subjects design also attempts to obtain equivalence between groups thus increasing the sensitivity of the experiment. It is where subjects are matched or equated on one or more variables (other than the independent variable) assumed to have an effect on the dependent variable. Then, whenever possible, the subjects are randomly assigned to conditions. In this way, the sensitivity of the experiment is increased.
For example, a researcher may identify the variable of subject intelligence as having an impact on the dependent variable. All the subjects would be matched on intelligence level, holding this variable constant and therefore controlling for it in all groups. The subjects would then be randomly assigned to experimental conditions.
A matched-subjects design can also mean that each subject has a matched subject in each of the other conditions so that the groups are correlated. Therefore, rather than using the same subjects in each condition as in the repeated-measures design, the matched-subjects design uses different subjects in each condition who have been matched as much as possible on identified variables.
Independent-groups Design: This research design is also known as a between-subject design as it has different subjects in each group. The separate or independent groups of subjects receive different levels of the independent variable, so there is no chance of one treatment contaminating the other. In its simplest form, the experimental group receives the independent variable and the control group does not.
However, the independent-groups design has the potential of introducing variables other than the independent variable because of differences among the subjects in the groups. These extraneous variables may confuse the clear relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable. Therefore, to minimise the confounding of subject characteristics with the independent variable, subjects need to be either randomly assigned to the different conditions or matched between groups on personal characteristics. These procedures ensure the formation of equivalent groups of subjects.
Repeated-measures Design:In order to control for variations in subject characteristics (which may influence the dependent variable), a within-subjects design may be used called a repeated-measures design. This is where the subjects within an experiment are tested or measured more than once, i.e. they are repeatedly measured. The same subjects are used in each condition, receiving all levels of the independent variable thereby guaranteeing equivalence of groups at the beginning of the study.
For example, subjects may be given a pre-test and then asked to complete a post-test. In this way, the subject characteristics remain constant.
Another example is if a researcher wanted to study attention span for complex and simple visual stimuli. The researcher may test the same children who would be exposed to both the complex and the simple visual stimuli conditions. The attention span of all children would be tested under each of the two conditions, hence the subjects are repeatedly measured. This ensures that the two groups are equivalent in subject characteristics, minimising the influence of extraneous variables.
Definition of Operational Hypothesis: The IV and the DV in an experiment need to be operationalised. This refers to the precise way in which the variable has been measured. It is a statement of how the variable can be expressed as a quantity.
Before collecting any data, a hypothesis needs to be formulated. A hypothesis is an 'educated guess' about the relationship(s) between two or more variables which can be scientifically tested. Psychologists use the word 'educated' as the hypothesis is derived from some theory or previous research which educates the researcher when formulating a hypothesis for his/her study. A hypothesis is also a 'guess' because it is not a statement of fact or certainty and could be supported or refuted through the process of data collection.
Initially, the hypothesis may be stated in more general terms, e.g. 'that stress increases blood pressure'. This form is too broad to be tested statistically and must be expressed more precisely.
When designing the research, the hypothesis needs to be operationalised, i.e. the variables must be clearly defined and measurable. The operational hypothesis should include both the independent and dependent variables and predict a direction of the changes in the dependent variable.
Inferring from Data: This is when statements or conclusions are drawn from the results obtained in an experiment. Inferences are made of the effect the IV has on the DV.
Conclusion:A conclusion is a judgment about the meaning of the results in an experiment. It relates to the effect of the independent variable on the subjects involved.
If a representative sample was selected, appropriate data collection methods were employed and conditions carefully controlled, then the study is most likely internally valid and appropriate conclusions can be drawn. If there is a confounding of variables in the experiment, then the conclusion may be questioned.
Generalisation:A generalisation is a statement that has related the results of the experiment to a wider population. The statement goes beyond the current experiment and generalises to other people or settings.
A generalisation can only extend as far as the population that the sample in the study has represented. This is termed external validity. At times, generalisations of the results should not be made because of specific circumstances or subjects in the experiment.
Statistical Significance:Statistical significance is a way of using statistical tests to determine the probability that an observed difference in the results is due to chance. If the difference is statistically significant, it is improbable that the difference was caused by chance; therefore, the hypothesis would be supported.
The most commonly used significance levels are .05 and .01. If you decide before calculating your statistical tests that the .05 significance level is to be used, this means you will accept as a real difference only one that is so large that it could have occurred by chance only 5 times in 100 (p less than .05). If the .01 significance level is selected, then the difference can be expected to occur only 1 time in 100 by chance (p less than .01).
Scatter Diagram: A scatter diagram is the graphic technique used to represent the relationship between two variables. The scores of one set of data are plotted on the X axis and the scores of the other set of data are plotted on the Y axis.
The dots are then observed to see if they cluster in a particular way. If the dots seem to be dispersed everywhere and the correlation coefficient is zero, then there is no relationship between the two variables. This is referred to as a zero correlation, where the change in one variable has no effect on the other variable, e.g. hair colour and sporting ability.
Measures of Relationship: Relational research attempts to show how two variables change together. The correlation method of investigation is used when a researcher wants to establish the relationship between two variables. The degree of relationship between the two variables is termed the correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient not only indicates how strongly two variables are related but also the direction, whether it be positive or negative, of the relationship.
The correlation coefficient, symbolised by the letter r, extends from -1.00 through 0 to +1.00. A correlation coefficient of -1.00 or +1.00 indicates a perfect correlation. A score between these figures would indicate either a strong correlation or a weak correlation. The closer to zero the figure is, whether it be positive or negative, the weaker the correlation. For example, a correlation of 0.55 indicates a stronger relationship between two variables than a correlation of 0.25 and a correlation of -0.85 indicates an even stronger relationship.
The correlation method is useful to a researcher as it enables the researcher to make predictions. It indicates if a relationship exists between two variables and the strength of the relationship. However, remember that the correlation method cannot demonstrate causation. The researcher cannot assume that because two variables are related to one another that one causes the other.
Negative Correlation:In contrast to a positive correlation, a negative correlation indicates an inverse relationship between two variables. This means that a high score on variable X is associated with a low score on variable Y, or a low score on variable X is associated with a high score on variable Y.
For example, one could predict a negative correlation between the number of police patrolling the streets and the rate of crime in that area. The dots on the scatter diagram would still cluster together but would indicate that as one variable increases in value the other variable decreases in value.
Positive Correlation:When both variables change in the same direction, i.e. either increasing or decreasing in value, it is referred to as a positive correlation. This indicates a direct relationship between the two variables, where high scores on variable X are associated with high scores on variable Y and low scores on variable X are associated with low scores on variable Y.
For example, one could predict a positive correlation between the number of hours practicing a sport and the number of games won. In this case most of the dots on the scatter diagram would be clustered together, indicating that an increase in one variable is associated with an increase in the other variable.
Participants' Rights:Confidentiality refers to the principle that all personal information and responses of the participants in an experiment must not be revealed without their permission. Questionnaires or any data collecting devices should not display any of the participants' personal details and, should the researcher need to retest in the course of a longitudinal study, information identifying the participants must be kept separate from their responses.
In any psychological study, participants must be involved on a voluntary basis, i.e. they are given the freedom to decline participation. Participants must not be coerced, given inducements or threatened in any way. If they are given a payment, it should only be to cover any costs incurred in being involved in the study rather than serving as a money making exercise. Participants should be told that they are free to withdraw at any stage of the study so their welfare is not compromised in any way.
Informed Consent Procedures:Before any investigation begins, potential subjects need to decide whether to participate in an experiment after being informed of the nature and purpose of the research. As already stated, their participation must be totally voluntary and whenever possible, their consent should be obtained in writing.
Debriefing:This is where the researcher, in a post-experimental session, explains the true nature of the research to the participants. The participants are then given the opportunity to ask any questions about the research and to comment freely on any part of the experiment.
This procedure ensures that the participants experience no lasting harm while still ensuring that the purpose of the investigation is not compromised.
Professional Conduct:The researcher of any study should adhere to the ethical principles outlined above and should maintain a rigorous standard in each stage of the research. He/she should respect the rights of the participants and use the data collected to draw appropriate and valid conclusions in order to further the knowledge base in the given area.
The objectives of the research should be clear and justify the treatment of the subjects, whether they be human or animal.
An Overview of Ethical Considerations:Before any psychological research is undertaken, the experimenter must make sure that all ethical considerations have been taken into account. The research needs to be carefully designed so that the data can be collected without harming the participants in any way, whether it be physical or psychological.
Once the experimenter is satisfied that the study does not breach any ethical guidelines, he/she must submit the proposal of the research to an ethics committee who scrutinise it before giving the experimenter permission to proceed.
During the course of the study, the experimenter must act professionally and not breach any ethical boundaries. They should take all precautions.
Empirical Research: https://alison.com/topic/learn/69923/empirical-research