Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Comparing First and Third World Countries (Third World (Building a bike…
Comparing First and Third
World Countries
Third World
Able to carry large amounts of rocks and
twigs for long periods of travel.
Strong with materials that can handle large weights.
Developing
Building a bike for third world countries, we must assume that its not not only going to used for transport to A-B.
Carry Large weights to make
money out of the bike.
Road or mountain bikes
for the rigid terrain.
If there are bikes in certain areas, they will be unreliable and have a large chance of braking because they have been handed down or donated.
Leading them to be second hand.
Looking up "Bikes" within a google search
you will get bikes from the First World and not the Third World.
Bikes in the Third World have a huge impact on a day to day basis comparing this to the First World.
Many people in the First World are not thankful for having
a bike while in Third World countries this changes lives for them
small things have a huge impact.
First World
Light weighted but can handle heave weights for people that are larger in size.
Used for fitness.
Encourages a healthy lifestyle.
Developed
Using First and Third world bikes, First World bikes
are built to last over a large length of time, but for quality
comes a much greater price.
Once these bikes have been warn out their uses they could be transferred to the Third World.
If I have a bike and where i need to go is close
"why would you I need to waste fuel, when I can ride there?"
Leading to why road bikes being developed.
Some bikes in the First World become
so advanced that after a few pedals the bike is going on its own, all you need to do is steer.
High tech and well design with the thought in mind of keeping the rider healthy.
Showing of calories burned etc.