Neuroscience: Historical Perspectives

Early Theories: Mind/soul - Body/Brain

Localise Mind without Brain: Neuroanatomy

Neuron Doctrine: Modern Neuroscience

Localisation and Brain Mapping: Phrenology to Cortical Topography

Mind brain - related but separate, Magnus: brain = centre of mental activity, mental brain and function = linked but mind is immaterial

Plato

Earliest = Egyptians

  • Cases of head/neck injuries
  • Brain controlling behaviour
  • Heart is most important (mummification)

Homer - Psyche: non-localised soul, individual life/identity, NOT specific body part, dreams (prior to Freud), life vs body soul

Natural Philosophers

Explain constitution of matter in substances (elements)

Rejected supernatural

Addressed problem of nature of soul

Brain or heart?

Encephalocentrism: brain is seat of human consciousness, sensation and knowledge

Cardiocentrism: attributed all these faculties to the heart

Anatomical dissections

Western Medicine

Aristotle - Cardiocentric, different soul faculties, reside in heart

Galen

Cognitive sig. of brain - channel like structure

Human brain similar to animals (2 hemispheres)

Seat of consciousness and sensation

Distinguished bewteen sensation and understanding (build on)

Lateralisation of effects of brain injury

Epilepsy not scared

Brain = seat of intellect, causing neurological disorders

no difference between sense in the brain, more central functions (Sensation + knowledge)

Encephalicentric

3 species of soul

  • Logos (head/divine)
  • Thymos (chest/feelings)
  • Epithemtikon (liver/hunger, passion, unconsious)

Against cardio-centric

Brain received sensations, produces images and understands thoughts

Rigorous anatomical testing

Brain + spine = nerves (connections)

Ventricular Hypothesis

Pig = kept breathing, not squealing, after throat nerves cut - voice from brain not heart

Brain = reciprocal for the soul - communication

Neuroanatomy rebirth

Da Vinci - relating structure to mental function

Anatomical detail

Wax cast of ventricle

Ventricularist - responsible for major brain functions, soul in brain rather than surrounding

Vesalius = Non-ventricularist

Rejected ventricular localisation

Mammals = same brain but not intelligence

Cartesian Legacy

Mediated by fluid dynamics

Tech as metaphor

"Balloonist Theory": brain controlled body mechanically via fluids

Mind in pineal gland (endocrine gland) - between two hemispheres

Cartesian Dualism = immaterial and material interaction

Gap = how can they interact?

Cortex = seat of psychological functions

  • Still cartesian - so still problem with gap
  • contact and causal interaction is cortex not pineal gland

Understanding nervous system

Microscopy > understanding of nervous system organisation

Histological methods > detail

Reticularists vs. Cell theories

Dendrites, cell bodies, axons

R = NS is large network of tissue, fused processes. Network not individual cells

CT = cells are separate but communicate as NS

Both = same methods but different conc. about structure

Limit = low mag + poor resolution

Organisation of NS

Purkinje Cells

Golgi Staining

Modern Neuroscience

Rete Nervosa Diffusa

Early microscopes = distortions, Newer = clearer

Discovering cerebellar cells (largest invertebrate)

Microscopic image of nerve

Silver nitrate method

Nervous tissue = continuous, not discrete

Connections with infinite others

Holistic approach: NS as reticulum

Thought observation confirmed hyp that NS = continuous network

Santiago, Ramon and Cajal

Acceptance of Neuron Doctrine

Neuron = anatomical/functional unit of NS

Relationship is not continuity but contiguity

Staining Improved - Cajal

Neuron

Tenets

  • Fundamental structural and functional unit of NS is neuron
  • Neurons = discrete not continuous cells
  • 3 Parts - dendrites, cell body, axon
  • Info flows in one direction

Reasons for delay

  • Technical: histological preparation and optic quality microscope need to be improved
  • Area of study: nerve cells = extraordinary complex + variable structure
  • Theoretical: Belief that cell continuity necessary for interaction

Immersing tissues in fixative and silver nitrate 2nd, deep

Axon endings = consistent with location of dendrites

No evidence for reticulum - abandoned

Constituted by numerous neuron units

Nerve cell, nerve fibre, terminal arborizations

Synapse = direction (polarised)

Theory supported by electron microscope techniques

Early Observation Effects of Brain Damage - Diseases of the brain, not paralysed tongue but can't speak > memory

Localisation

Phrenology

Against Localization

Brain Mapping + Lesions

Wernicke's Aphasia

Brain equipotentiality theory: brain functions as whole

Localisation: specialisation in the brain

  • Brain composed of many organs, dedicated to particular skill
  • Size of organ = measure of power
  • Shape = determined by development of organs
  • Skull takes shape from brain > surface = accurate index
    *Greater use = increased
  • Analysis = insight into personality

Phrenometer = measure bumps on skulls

Functional specialisation = not empirically derived/constrained by theories

Animal lesions did not cause specific deficits

Aggregate field: whole brain in behaviour

One faculty, one seat in organs

Cortical specialisation for uniquely human capacity for speech

Lost speech 20yrs before

Post-mortem

Lesion in L inferior frontal cortex

Specific area and specific dysfunction

Language understanding

Problems after damage to posterior part of L hemisphere

Nothing to do with speaking but understanding

Brain Mapping

First

Motor Cortex

Dogs stimulated with electric current

W/ Anatomy

Contribution

Surface = muscles contractions face and neck on opposite side

Unilateral ablation of forepaw did not affect sensation but impaired motor

Epilepsy: disease on one side of brain = convulsions on the other

Speculation: motor cortex = somatopically

Brodmann

Systematic investigation of variation of cortex cellular properties

Somatosensory map = organised adjacent to body surface

Motor map = musculature represented in adjacent parts

Empirical approach explaining

Dualism > materialism

Reductionism