Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
TOKYO TRIALS (JUSTICES (Only 3/11 were Asian despite Asian countries…
TOKYO TRIALS
JUSTICES
Judges drop in and out as trial progresses - go on for so long, busy. E.g. Australia
-
-
-
-
-
Didn't have backups, unlike Nuremberg - frequent absences- Dower
-
-
ROLE OF THE US
-
-
-
HYPOCRISY
At time of trial US was attempting global containment of Communism but refused defense argument of fear of Communism - Dower
-
Many Japanese, and Justice Pal, didn't see Japan's actions as unique
-
MISSED
Defence not allowed to discuss the prosecution engaging in similar crimes e.g. Soviet breaking of treaty and POW, US bomb
-
Unit 731
-
Connection to emperor - brother allegedly deeply involved, circumstantial evidence that the emperor knew
Use of Chinese test subjects - less were Korean, Soviet and Allied POWs
Class A
Some put in Sugamo and never tried, therefore released e.g. Kishi Nobusuke, becomes PM - signed declaration of war
Cold War - pragmatic, reliably anti-Communist
-
-
-
-
EMPEROR HIROHITO
-
Much historical debate about his personal responsibility, centred on how much personal control he had
-
-
-
-
Herbert Bix argues that the blanket exoneration of the imperial family distorted Japanese view of the war
-
LAW
-
-
Changed rules after war - being tried for things that weren't a crime when they committed them - Dower
-
-
-
-
REACTION
-
DISSENT
-
4 dissenting judges, Pal only one who disagreed with virtually all findings
-
-
-
All submitted opinions at verdicts - trial flawed, hypocrisy and no emperor
-
-