Was justice served in the film 12 Angry Men? (Boy (The boy could not…
Was justice served in the film 12 Angry Men?
The boy could not remember the names of the movies that were out
Juror # 4 sayd he is Guilty since He did not actually go to the movies
Juror # 8 asks #4 questions about what he did the days before, had hard time remembering what happened.
also, the boy was being interview by detective in his house, right near where his father was dead
woman saw boy stab man
Jury could tell she wore glasses since she had marks on her noise. this means that she probably didn't have time to put on her glasses to see who exactly was stabbong the man, since he was going to sleep
Male witness heard son say "im going to kill you." Also heard the body hit the floor, and he saw the boy running down the stairs
Subway noise was passing by, would make noise muffle
Walking speed to get to the part where he saw the boy was a span a 15 seconds.
They test it out and determine that it could have acctually taken him 40 seconds to reach the sairs since he had a stroke before
Female witness saw stabbing through last 2 windows of passing car; screamed
subway is loud, would have been hard to see the stabbing
One of the pieces of evidence that was discussed in the case was about the boys knife,
this was a very unique knife that was bought by the boy in the night of the killing.
The boy said that he lost it in a hole in his pocket. The same unique knife was found in the boys father.
Juror #8 makes defends the boy because he was able to find another exact knife at the neighborhood pawn shop
The stab wound
In the notes, the stab wound was down and in the chest of the man.
Juror # 5 had previous street knowledge about the slums since he grew up in them. He showed that the boy would have stabbed his father from the side if he were to kill him. since it was a quicker way to attack