Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Vocalisation and Call Activity Pattern of the Blue-Eared Barbet (Megalaina…
Vocalisation and Call Activity Pattern of the Blue-Eared Barbet (Megalaina australis) in Kubah National Park, Sarawak (Manjaji, C., 2017)
-
-
-
Materials and Methods 3%
- No details on the goals of research and the challenges that may face to achieving these goal
- No scale provide on the table
- For word figure in table need in italics
Literature review 3%
Part 2.2: Good as the importance of vocalisation study being included. Other research evidence also included to support statement.
-
Part 2.1: Writing is good. Describing the taxonomic, behaviour, morphology and the Asian Barbets vocal and calling behaviour precisely. Diversity of Asian Barbet at the research site also included.
Part 2.4: Lack of other study research and findings. Research study referred quite latest which is on 2013.
Overall:
- More research and finding about the same study at the same area can be included if available.
- The knowledge gap is not too big as there are some latest reference and citation used.
- The writing are more specific than introduction.
- Language and sentences used is understandable for readers.
- Lack of detail explanation
Results
-
Data Presentation 6%
Acceptable figures shown, with slight mistake in format
-
-
Discussion 25%
-
back up most interpretation with valid results, does not claim findings that are not evident from the data
-
-
-
-
does not discuss on the correlation of weather parameters and call frequency as mentioned in part result (why frequency of call highest when rainfall was highest?)
References 2%
Wrong APA format in writing the reference; the name of authors that is more than one individual should be written with the symbol '&' not 'and'
Wrong way of writing reference from journal article; the name of journal is not italicized and the symbol ';' should be replaced with the symbol ','
-
-
-
Conclusion 8%
There is final comment of suggestion which include the improvements and future directions that can be made.
-
-
-
The conclusion is not a repetitive summary which will reduces the argument impact that developed in the writing
-