Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Wing assessment of the three most abundant species of butterflies…
Wing assessment of the three most abundant species of butterflies (Rhophalocera) in Serabang, Betong
REFERENCE
-
EVALUATION - 4% The thesis consistently models the APA language and conventions used in the scholarly/professional literature appropriate for publication. Original sources were clearly identified and correctly cited in both the body of the text and the reference section. Examiner found all cited sources on the reference list.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The writer need to write more about the relevant review to make sure all their reader understand their study.
-
-
-
EVALUATION - 4% Well researched in detail with accurate and critical evidence from a variety of sources. Most sentences are well constructed and have varied structure and length.
RESEARCH METHOD
-
-
-
-
Sampling collection - The total number of specimens collected and the tool used for capturing are stated.
-
Sampling site - The writer has stated Kampung Seraban as the location for sampling and included the map for the site located.
Preservation - The writer has stated that naphthalene or mothballs and wooden block are used to preserve the specimens for longer usage.
Data analysis - The writer has applied the usage of software (Microsoft Excel 2010) for data measurement analysing.
EVALUATION - 5% Appropriate, clear; describes procedures in detail, precisely describing how data were collected and handled; attention to relevant detail.
DISCUSSION
In this discussion the writer had clearly stated out the three most abundant species of butterflies in his sampling site along with their wing morphology.
The writer also included the information of previous studies to be compared with to strengthen his point.
-
Besides, the causes and factor of these wing differences have also clearly stated and explained.
-
-
INTRODUCTION
-
The writer also explains the difference in wings between insect orders and the other function of wings besides for aerodynamics
The writer did not cite the references correctly using APA style (For 2 authors should be & instead of and)
Introduction contains some grammatical errors. Readers find it hard to understand the main point of the study.
-
-
EVALUATION - 4% Proficient introduction that states background information, problem statement, topic, and all subtopics in proper order; thesis is a clear and arguable statement of position.
The writer explain the objective at the last 2 sentence from the last paragraph. The way the writer present the research objective should be in a neatly work so that it is easy to understand the purpose of the research.
RESULT
-
-
-
The way of results written are excellent but there are a few sentences that need to be explained well as the sentences give differents understanding to different readers.
The data from the findings is summarize into a table form which makes it easy to read. But some of the table caption are not well sentenced because it is quite hard to understand what the writer has presented
-
ABSTRACT
The author wrote the abstract in neatly manner and easy for the reader to understand. however, the author did not state the method of sampling for the research. Abstract should have the prior information of the research. basically it is a summarization of the thesis that include some of the data analysis. Since the author did not state some of the essential part for the abstract, the reader can only infer based on the given information.
-
-