Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
2.2 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE (1) CHANGES IN ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE…
2.2 ORGANISATIONAL
STRUCTURE
1) CHANGES IN ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
PROJECT BASED ORGANIZATION
ADVANTAGES
Well designed to respond to the market changes quickly
crossover ideas between employees different areas give more successful solutions
allows total communication between all team members
DISADVANTAGES
less direct control from the top
conflict of interests may occur
PROJECTMANAGERS RUN TEAM OF EMPLOYEES
focus on individual projects
many teams operate at once
more flexible and responsive to market demands
organized many projects
PROJECT COMPLETES
team split
begin another project
team borrows members of different department to complete the project
SHAMROCK ORGANIZATION
SUGGESTED BY CHARLES HANDY
INCREASE RESPONSE TIME
retain multiskilled core
can reduce cost
gain competitive advantage
THE FLEXIBLE SRUCTURE
one centred on team-based problem solving
by removing horizontal boundaries between departments
reducing middle management layers to the minimum
will able to respond to the clients rapidly
2) COMMUNICATION
VISUAL
relieves on sight
can be permanent, recognizable, immediate
but can be difficult
1) limited sight person
2) communication not
3) positioned appropriately
formal
1) presentations
2) notice board
3) symbols
informal
1) gesture
2) body language
WRITTEN
relieves on written word
Can be effective
1) message can be kept
2) writing can be amended
but can be considered impersonal tone of message may be lost
informal
1) memos
2) emails
3) blog
formal
1) reports
2) letters
3) notices
VERBAL
relies on spoken word
can be quick, direct, effective
but can be misunderstood, not allow for feedback
formal
1) presentations
2) interview
3) meeting
informal
1) gossiping
2) face-to-face
3) telephone conversations
ALSO KNOWN AS MATRIX STRUCTURE