Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
High Level Processing (Unconscious Processing (unconscious in the brain…
High Level Processing
Judgment
-
-
two types of reasoning
-
inductive: 归纳
based on observations, from specific to general, new information created in the conclusion
can not prove inductive reasoning, it is about probability - improbable but not impossible: p<0.05
anchoring
-
even people know about, it is difficult to ignore
-
-
Reasoning
Dual-process model
-
based on reasoning - rule-driven, more accurate - system 2 thinking; let participants use more reasoning, better judgement
base rates and perception of causality; size of the sample is extremely important; effects of training
inductive reasoning
hypothesis testing(a form of inductive reasoning): confirmation bias: fail to test rule by constructing counterexamples
confirmation bias leads to belief perseverance: a tendency to continue supporting a hypothesis even the available data do not support it.
deductive reasoning
even if the premise is not true in the real world, logically it is valid. deductive validity
-
Wason election Task + Cheng & Hopyoak: context activating schemas, ground the information
Syllogisms
Linear Syllogisms: can be solved spatially or abstractly or combinations of both, no correct strategy
Categorical Syllogisms: two premises (including category membership) and a conclusion,
-
-
-
Intelligence
-
-
factor analysis
-
"g": underlying general intelligence factor, even people have variation of each part, overall their scores will be elevated (one or two problems can indicate the overall intelligence )
-
environment factors
-
social context: same math mindset behind the task but framed in two different context (masculine vs. feminine)
applied context (home keepers good at problems related to buying food vs. medicinal herbs even though same underlying math mindset)
physical context: street children, good at same type of work outside vs. in classroom
-
-
-
Unconscious Processing
-
unconscious - happening all the time but we unaware of them - when we dream we can access the unconsciousness
other names
automatic processing: learn to drive, level of unconscious
nonconsoncious/subconscious - unaware processing, just other names
Freud's unconscious
-
no scientific evidence for the idea one part of memory keep the other part of memory hidden in this dynamic way; it only can do confirm after the event
unconscious in the brain
able to form implicit memory - cerebellum & basal ganglia(H.M. hippocampus - explicit memory) - there is a separate system remains from the explicit memory
blind sight - secondary visual system, superior colloculum - damage in v1-v4 they can not see explicit, but they have better chance of guessing the correct answer - back up visual system
emotional priming - face flashes so fast that people can't realize it, then people can more easily match facial expression than gender; primed with happy and angry (out of conscious awareness) faces right before neutral person, if they see the happy face of the person, they are more likely to hire him
-
unconscious attributions
self-serving bias: success - personality characteristics / failures- environment (defense mechanism is disabled with depression patients)
-
behavior
social glue: trying to make people feel comfortable, we would unconsciously mimic the other person
action slips: doing something different than what you intend, because of practice and familiarity
avoidance: role of the amygdala (she does not have explicit memories, but in one trail, she learns to avoid the pins hidden in the hand)
-
-
-
more evidence
they implicitly learn the correct grammar of strings of grammar, they nevertheless pick out the right answer though they can't say the rule
without participants told anything, they can transfer one rule to the other thing - shows more flexibility in unconscious
group distracted did better in making decisions - our brain make better decisions in short time with less cognitive awareness- the other group, interfere & obstacles in details
administered increasing strong shocks, placebo vs. control - both group experience the same physical symptoms but attribution to different thing: pill or electric shock, but they don't admit that the placebo is the reason why they endure more shock