Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Intergroup Bias (Contact Hypothesis (Favourable conditions (Acquaintance…

- - - - Stereotypes disconfirmed
    - - Metanalysis
  - - - Close friendships
      - Reduction of anxiety
- - - - Other in-group members more similar to self
      - 2 groups seen as more different than actually are
      - Group members seen as more similar to each other (particularly outgroups)
    - - Zero sum conflicts
- - - - Improving attitudes to former outgroup members
      - Previously isolated lab groups brought together through seating patterns, labels
        
        Separate individuals
        
        Decreased attraction to former in-group
        
        Two groups
        
        More bias
        
        One group
        
        increased attraction to former outgroup
    - - short lived or unrealistic
      - deprives of valued social identities
      - strong resistance from preexisting social structural variables
  - - - Making category memberships salient may lead to biased perceptions, reinforcing stereotypes or increase anxiety
  - - - Cooperative
    - - Distinctive
    - - Especially if superordinate category inclusive and didn't convey distinctiveness
      - Superordinate vs subordinate vs mix
    - - Effectiveness may vary over in-group dmains
        
        subgroups may threaten identity of the superordinate group or undermine identities of large group