Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Quality Assurance in Ultrasound (Abdominal Organs) (Process of…
Quality Assurance in Ultrasound (Abdominal Organs)
Introduction
Significance of quality assurance
Significance of Protocol
Journal and case study images
Kidney measurements
Liver measurements
Real cases
cases that do not correlate
Limitations
HIPPA
Access to cases
Value of QA to steak holders
Accreditation
AIUM
Specificity
file:///C:/Users/Joe/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/IE/054VC565/AIUM%20accreditation%20-abdominal.pdf
file:///C:/Users/Joe/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/IE/261T9EJO/AIUM%20abdomen%20practice%20parameter.pdf
file:///C:/Users/Joe/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/IE/T5PLJH8K/AIUM%20abdomen%20practice%20parameter%202.pdf
ACR
Cases that do correlate
Standardization
Process of standardization
Team approach in J&C
Norming
In J&C Standardized our images 3
Storming
In J&C Revised and developed 2
Forming
In J&C formed with taking images 1
Performing
In J&C Took the standardized images 4
Team approach hospitals QA
Forming
Buy in from higher up (managers/radiologists)
Storming
Initial analysis of cases
norming
Development of consistency through protocol
performing
Performing consistent evaluations
Robbie, P., & Pickett, F. (2009). Theory vs. Bricks and Mortar--Forming, Norming, Storming, and Performing: The CEFPI Multiple Learning and Multiple Intelligence Design Charrette. Educational Facility Planner, 43(4), 16-18.
text*