Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Comparison (Step 1: Identify common criterion (content) [6] (List all main…
-
Reliability/Utility
Step 4 Source critique
Unreliable
- (Who)Provenance is one of the characters
- (What)What he said support the stand of this character/biased/opinionated
- (Why)For his personal interests. / Expected
Reliable
- (Who) Provenance is none of the two characters
- (What) What he said is unbiased/objective/stating facts/tentative words
- (Why) No personal interest involved/No motive
- (Who) Provenance is one of the characters
- (What) What he said contradicts/harms this character
- (Why) For the good of the society, sacrifice personal interest /Unexpected
Once there is a purpose, the source is unreliable
-
- Gut feeling: Even is cross-reference tells it is reliable, it feels unreliable - Tone
-
-
-
Step 1 Gut feeling
-
-
Why do you think so? (key point)
- This may determine the highest level
-
Step 3 Cross-reference
-
- Find its claim and compare
-
SBCS skills
Purpose
-
Message
-
When there is a 'should', caution! It is more likely to be the purpose.
Telling a state, condition, fact, opinion
Different from claim. If there is difficulty, link to the topic question
Outcome
-
Outcome should be strong and specific
(e.g. the author wants Singaporeans to support FCF policy :red_cross:
The author wants Singapore companies to adhere to the .. policy) :check:
Cross-reference
-
Find the claim of the source first.
- Claim is different from message. Claim is the author's opinion to the criteria provided in the question
-
-