Chapter 9
Assessment for Distance Education
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., and Zvacek, S. (2014). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education, 6th Edition. (p. 225-255) Charlotte, NC. Information Age Publishing
Why Assess?
Teachers
Stakeholder
Learners
formative
Summative
Summative
Formative
Reporting
Progress
Regulatory
Funding prioities
Modify Misconceptions
Provide Feedback to teacher
Learning Improment
Grading
Motivation
Gain Certification
Id Learner misconceptions
click to edit
Adjust methods
Process
Measure
Document
Interperpert
Learning
Grading
Effectivements (feedback)
Certification
Demonstrate
Progress
Mastery
Evidence of learning
Mastery Learning could discuss Bloom Time and Learning (1974)
Stated most learners could learn most task given time.
Human variation in learning means that bottom 5% of learners need about five times the time to learn a task as the top 5% of learners, but given time to master the task early, they will learn to learn and often take about the same time to learn the subsequent related task.
Assessment as and ISD Function
Assess to a standard
Build assessment as the instruction is being designed
Types of Assessment
Norm Referenced
Criterion-Referenced
Good fo Grading
Best to compare performance of large groups
Makes grading more relevent
Identifies gaps early in process
Validity
Affects reliaibility
Expetations
Assessment Measures
Formative/Summative
Objective/Subjective
Subjective
Objective
Standerized
Show a personal product
Text states Mastery
but at what level of learning?
Easier to grade
Needs clear standards
I thank a better measure of mastery
Rubric
Model Answers
Interater issues
Short Answer
Matching
M/C
T/F
Summative
Formative
Good Method to gain feeback
Allows adjustment over time
Coaching
Should be Criterion based
Outcome Focused
Snapshot of knowledge a particular time
Communication
Diagnostic
Placement
not mentioned in text but can be used for branching instruction
Communication
Asynchronous
Design
CMS
Test production Program
Software
Questionmark
Respondus
Proctoring
Online discussion Forum
wiki
Blogs
Synchronous
Journals
Orals
Cost and time
One on One
Learning Groups
Presence
Portfolios
Moving into other field (UMW) using instead of COMPS in some Graduate programs
click to edit
Used in Some "product oriented" field
Multimedia Products
Problem based learning
may include a product like paper or presentation
may be No graded
Academic Misconduct
Verifying student Identity on line
Plagiarism
"Pell Runners"
Are they real Students?
$800M in 2012
Cheating
Technology to detect
Turn it In
SafeAssign
System depends on trust
Depressing to know that services exist to facilitate cheating
Technology is available
Competency Based Education
Prior leaning Assessment
Common in the Military
Lowers cost and time
Can benifit adult learner
Certificates
common in skill based learning
Trades
Reflections
These chapters of education text are frequently depressing for me. Not because of content related to assessment and methods, but rather because they inevitably turn to academic dishonesty. The issues of cheating and plagiarism and paper mills fall into my question of Why?
I was a poor student when I attended college in the early 80's too many distractions and freedom for a young man … resulting in joining the military and waiting until 1996 before I finally graduated. What I can say with all honesty is that I earned those poor marks. I was not the end of the world. When I returned to college a decade later I had the discipline of a good student and competed for the requirements and earned those marks well. When I worked on the railroad from 2005-2009 conductors and engineers were caught cheating on certain mandatory rules test and signals test. My life depended on these people being competent at their job. So when I read about the organized cheating it depresses me as a trainer and as a learner. It takes time to learn, either you want to learn or move on.
If I am not good enough to do something so be it. I will move on or go fishing.
When I hear about $800M stolen in fraudulent Pell grants it angers me as a taxpayer.
On the positive side I always see a better way to apply my craft from these chapters.