The concept of the Majority rule is confusing to me. While majority rule has some good perks such as being quick and efficient, it seems to have some serious drawbacks. Having every vote count equally seems a little skewed. Personally, I feel like this would lead to people already in positions of power brainwashing the group members in a bid to gain more votes. Also, if every vote counts equally, that would put a doctor's voice, and a murderer's voice at an equal level, which, to me, seems wrong. Wouldn't a minority rule by expert automatically be a better alternative compared to all the other rules? Sure it's got drawbacks, but none of them affect the outcome to be less effective.