Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Issue 2: If Harris makes the showing in Issue 1, burden shifts to the…

- - - - There are many cases listed. I chose to look at two that are the 1)most binding and 2) most analogous to these facts.
        
        Case 1: Holt v. Hobbs 135 S.Ct. 853
        
        Case 2: Native American Council of Tribes v. Weber
        750 F.3d 742
        
        While this case gives great arguments, the facts are not very close to the case at hand, and since there are others that closer resemble our case, I will probably not use this one.
    - - Case 1: Jihad v. Fabian, D.Minn.2010, 680 F.Supp.2d 1021.
        
        This was also in issue 1
      - Case 2: Holt v. Hobbs 135 S.Ct. 853
    - - Filters: Jurisdiction, Reported cases, Supreme Court, Circuit Courts, and District Courts Notes of Decision topic: Least Restrictive Means
        
        This returned many of the same cases that I found from my other searches. I don't find this avenue with this issue particularly helpful.
        
        At this point, seeing many of the similar cases, I am starting to recognize I have exhausted my searches here.
- - - - This source is recent (2018) and lists key cases that relate to the topic.
        
        The key cases confirm I have found leading cases, as they are citied here.
        
        I did not find this as helpful because the cases were either outside of my jurisdiction or they were cases I already found.
- - - - This case identifies great arguments that help to suggest what "least restrictive means indicates."
  - - - Denies motion for SJ to both P and D. Useful because goes through "compelling interest" and "least restrictive means"
    - - This case is a good support, although the P won. The facts are analogous to our case.