Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
REVENGE TRAGEDIES (Context (Elizabethan Context (Divine right (Kings were…
REVENGE TRAGEDIES
Context
-
-
-
The ghost is a catholic figure from the medieval world, emerging from purgatory
Hamlet has been studying at Protestant university and is torn between the demands of two conflicting historical worlds - perhaps this links with his inability to act and FATAL FLAW
Both the Church and gov. forbade revenge, even though it remained part of the aristocratic honour code
Politically dangerous - kingship, rights of succession + Divine Right of Kings
History
Ancient Greece
-
Protagonist - the individual whose suffering constitutes a central part of the tragedy - known as the tragic hero but these terms can be associated with "virtue" which is not necessarily true of protagonists
The Poetics, Aristotle
Protagonist had a certain nobility - high birth, courageous, generous: megalopsychia (greatness of the soul0
The protagonist could not be a man who has totally good or the audience would only feel disgust at the injustice of his destruction in the play's catastrophe; if he was wicked the audience would rejoice at his fall
Two extremes
-
Fall from misery is not due to vice and depravity, but rather to some error
-
The Spanish Tragedy, 1589, Thomas Kyd
-
Renaissance
A Royal Protagonist
Dramatists decided that kings and princes were not the only candidates for the role of the protagonist
-
-
Middle Ages
-
Some people argued that tragedies were not possible inChristian societies: God's providence will ensure that the wicked are punished and the good rewarded
Tragedy during this period shrunk in scope to a moral message about how the turning of the Wheel of Fortune will bring about the fall of Kings and Princes who put faith in earthly power rather than God
-
The Protagonist
Fatal Flaw
A.C. Bradley's Shakespearean Tragedy (1904) proposed the idea of the tragic flaw in the psychological make-up of the protagonist.
Is a rewriting of Aristotle's idea of Hamartia (error of judgement) - but note that hamartia is a matter of action, not character
What we do feel strongly, as tragedy advances to its close, is that calamities and catastrophe follow inevitable from the deeds of men, and that the main source of these deeds is character
-
-
-
Early critics
Samuel Johnson
Of the feigned madness of Hamlet there appears no adequate cause, for he does nothing he might have done with the reputation of sanity. He plays the madman most when he treats Ophelia with so much rudeness, which seems to be useless and wanton cruelty...
Hamlet is, throughout the whole play, rather an instrument than an agent. ... and his [the King's] death is at last effected by an incident which Hamlet has no part in producing,
-
The Romantic View
They set out to find a psychological explanation for the Prince's inability to act on the Ghost's instructions
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Thought that Hamlet was a ,am for whom the world of the imagination had become more real than reality, and thus he could not commit himself to action
The effect of this overbalanced of the imaginative power is beautifully illustrated in the everlasting brooding and superfluous activities of Hamlet's mind, which, unseated from its healthy relation, (...) us abstracted from the world without (...) Hence it is that the sense of sublimity [awe-inspiring ability to produce powerful emotions] arises.
H's fatal flaw is that he's stuck in his imagination - but the romantics also found this somewhat admirable
Early 20th Century
Sigmund Freud
-
Thought that the Romantics were wrong to think H does not act - kills Polonious, sends R+G to their deaths
-
Hamlet is able to anything - except take vengeance on the man who did away with his father and took that of his father's place with the mother (...) Thus the loathing which should rive him on to revenge is replaced in him by self-reproaches, by scruples of conscience, which remind him that he himself is literally no better than the sinner whom he is to punish.
End of a Tragedy
-
Audience Response
Aristotle: Tragedy (...) is a representation of an action (...) presented in the form of action, not narration; by means of pity and fear bringing about the purgation of such emotions.
-
-
Catharsis
A.C. Bradley
-
We are also aware of a greater justice at work, as the universe strives to become a better palce
-
Despite the waste we are uplifted by the feeling that what happened was right and necessary - this is the experience of catharsis:
Bradley: Sometimes we are driven to cry out that these mighty or heavenly spirits (...) are too great for the little space in which they move, and that they vanquish into nothingness and freedom. (...) bringing to birth, together with glorious good, an evil which is able to overcome by self-torture and self-waste. And this fact or appearance is tragedy.
-
-
-
John Milton
Toook catharsis to mean that our emotional faculties are 'cleaned up', refreshed, and allowing use to leave the theatre better able to judge what is worthy of profound emotion and what is not
Tragedy teaches us to have some scale of proportion in our responses to the world, and to exercise properly a crucial part of our human state
-
-