ETÄNÄ-SAVO - TESTBED FOR TELEWORK IN RURAL HUBS (QUESTIONS (How can SMEs…
ETÄNÄ-SAVO - TESTBED FOR TELEWORK IN RURAL HUBS
Globally shattered talented workers
More knowledge intensive tasks in companies
Concentration of jobs in big cities
Limited amount of effective solutions
(How to organise the telework technologically, organisationally, regionally, logically?)
What is the role of SMEs in this transformation? How regional hubs can take advantage of the disruption?
In Finland - most jobs are located in big cities in Helsinki and Southern Finland
Other parts - jobs relocated in regional hub cities
Still exited problems with vitality
People in Finland do not often ready to relocate
Non-flexible housing market
The attempts to generate jobs are not very efficient in regional cities
Why don't the job follow the people? What kind of structures would support the flexibility of work? How South-Savo & Mikkeli could develop towards a teleworking hubs?
How can SMEs benefit from the disruption of work?
How recognise the opportunities for disruption?
How to develop new business models?
What are the capabilities needed?
Which facilities can support the co-working space organisation? What kind of tangible and intangible assets must be provided and shared?
RESEARCH GAP: Business model innovation in the context of co-working spaces
What are the mechanisms of communication and collaboration in teleworking?
What are the effects on entrepreneurship, open innovation, knowledge exchange?
What are the effects on the social networking?
Some more topics
Learn from others
Difference in BM
Some companies have already embedded remote working in their BM
How to create BM or disrupt it? BMI
Self employment lower unemployment
Co-working space provider