T5: Managing Turnover (Ch10)

Involuntary Turnover p.423 (Org decision to terminate)

Voluntary Turnover p.433(Employee decision to leave)

Principles of Justice

Reasons

Moral motivation

Makes good business sense as it protects reputation with:

Less likely to lead to legal action

Current employees

Future employees

Customers and suppliers

Categories

Interactional Justice: Was the decision delivered and implemented in a socially sensitive, considerate and empathic way?

Procedural Justice: Was the procedure followed consistent, unbiased, accurate, correctable, representative and ethical?

Outcome Fairness: Was the outcome fair relative to how others have been treated?

Very much in the perception of the recipient

Progressive Discipline

Discipline needs to be escalated gradually

Managers should document all steps clearly

Employees should be given feedback and the opportunity to improve

Alternative dispute resolution

Stage 2: Peer Review

Stage 3: Mediation involving a neutral third party

Stage 1: Open door policy

Stage 4: Arbitration by a qualified arbitrator

Employee assistance programmes (EAP)

Designed to deal with personal issues that may be impacting on performance

Funded by the employer

Employee avoids formal disciplinary actions while participating in a programme

Outplacement counselling

Provided by an independent party

Can be a group arrangement

Provided to displaced employees

Funded by employee

Helps with transition to job seeking and new employment

Reasons

Low satisfaction

Temptations from competitive labour market

Sources

Pay/benefits

Co-workers

Supervisors

Tasks and roles

Role issues

Role overload

Role ambiguity

Role under-load

Personal disposition

Negative affectivity / Theory X

Outcomes

Physical job withdrawal

Psychological job withdrawal

Behaviour change

Low self-evaluation

Solutions

Role analysis technique

Job rotation

Job enrichment programmes

Stagnant professional growth

Monitoring job satisfaction (strategic - survey-feedback process based on action research)

Values alignment

Perception and frame of reference

Unsafe working conditions

Preventative measures

Provide meaning and context to staff (example Edwards Lifesciences article)

Screen job applicants for negative affectivity (Zappos)

Role conflict

Task aspects

Flexibility of where/when

Value employee perceives in task

Complexity

found to increase opportunity for worked to have input in to decisions the involve their work

found to reduce role conflict and ambiguity

Offer flexible family-friendly policies - live them

Reduced abseenteeism

Raises commitment levels

Attracts best applicants

Prosocial motivation

Can increase meaning through understanding how each job fits into the organisation

Supports redundancy

Level of 'meaning'

Level of 'warmth'/civility

Support for work and career goals

Competence

Warm and competent supervisors and co-workers results in:

Working longer hours

Ok with delayed gratification

Promote regular social events that promote team building

Actively monitor and deal worth workplace bullies

Relative to organisation

Relative to market

Monitor market pay rates and ensure you stay at or above

Pay Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) p.445

Job Descriptive Index (JDI) p.444

Regular 'Pulse' surveys which focus on a specific topic/question p.445

Employee Survey Research - monitors trends and identifies potential problems before the grow

Monitoring provides empirical evidence of the impact of changes to policy, personnel, mergers, etc p.446

If standardised (above) can allow for benchmarking p.447

Benchmarking can identify what org offers better than industry and therefore can provide a basis for screening applicants for the right 'fit' p.447

Benchmarking can also be between different business units within an organisation to ensure consistency and guides for 'best practice' across the organisation, p.447

Vital that survey data includes exit interviews with employees who are leaving, this gives valuable data and indications of problem areas p.448