Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

INDIA-JAPAN (Comment: Indo-Japan relations are part of US-Japan relations.…

- - - - WHAT<? FOR JAPAN: JAPAN SIGNED 1ST CIVIL NUCLEAR DEAL WITH A NON SIGNATORY COUNTRY OF NPT I.E INDIA
      - WHAT <? FOR INDIA: INDIA AFFIRMS ITS UNILATERAL , SELF IMPOSED MORATORIUM FOR NOT CONDUCTING NUCLEAR TEST .. VIOLATION OF THIS WILL TERMINATE THE DEAL... THE ASSURANCE THAT INDIA DIDN'T EVEN GIVEN TO US AND NSG
  - - - AND ABE SEEK TO END POST WAR PACIFICISM.. AND WANTED JAPAN TO BE LIKE A "NORMAL" COUNTRY IN DIPLOMACY AND DEFENCE
        
        SO THOUGH CHINA PROVIDED PROVOCATION ... BUT HE LOOKED TO INDIA FOR LEGITIMACY
        
        THAT'S JAPAN AND INDIA ARE CLOSE TO US-2 AMBIGIOUS AIRCRAFT DEAL... WHICH ITSELF IS SIGNICANT GIVEN JAPAN'S SELF IMPOSED BAN ON MILITARY EXPORT
  - - - THAT'S WHY CONCEPT OF QUAD WHICH WAS FIRST HIGHLIGHTED IN 2007 AFTER 4 COUNTRIES ENGAGED IN MARITIME EXCERCISE... IS NOW NOW RESURFACED IN EAS SUMMIT ... ALSO INDIA WELCOMED JAPAN FOR MALABR EXCERCISE DURING DOKLAM ISSUE
      - AAGC TO COUNTER OBOR
      - JAPAN'S INFRASTRUCTUR IN NORTHEAST
    - - HARSH V PANT
        
        INDIA SEEMS MOST WILLING TO ACKNOWLEDGE TOKYO'S CENTRALITY IN SHAPING THE EVOLVING SECURITY ARCHIETECTURE IN INDO-PACIFIC
      - C RAJA MOHAN(INDO- JAPAN NOT BECOZ OF US-CHINA)
        
        BOTH COUNTRIES HAVE BEEN QUIETLY EEFECTIVE IN CONSTRUCTING NEW PARTNERSHIPOF SECURITY , ECONOMIC, AND POLITICAL COOPERATION TO ENSURE TOGETHER THEY AN SHAPE REGIONAL ORDER AND NOT SIMPLY ACCEPT THE RESULTS OF US-CHINA COMPETITION, COLLISION, COLLUSION
        
        ON INDIA-JAPAN- AUSTRALIA
        
        TOGETHER THEY COULD BUILD FIRST MULTIPLE MIDDLE POWER COILATION.. AND BEST POSITIONED TO DEMONSTARTE INDO-PACIFIC DIPLOMACY
        
        THIS IS NOT ABOUT CONSTRUCTING ASIA WITHOUT AMERICA. NOR IT SEEKS TO CONTAIN CHINA.. BUT IT IS ABOUT FINDING WAYS TO LIMIT REGIONAL INSTABILITY ADMIST SHIFTING DYNAMIC BETWEEN AMERICA AND CHINA
        
        THE TRIANGLE TOGETHER STILL MAY BE NOT ENOUGH TO BALANCE CHINA BUT IT WILL SEND STRONG MESSAGE TO TO BOTH CHINA AND US , FOR CHINA THAT IT CAN'T DISREGARD THE ECONOMIC AND SECURITY INTEREST OF ITS ASIAN NEIHGHBOURS AND FOR TRUMP TO START LISTENING RATHER THAN LECTURING
- - - - AND IT WILL COMPLEMENT
        INDO-PACIFIC ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
      - WHICH WILL ENHANCE CONNECTIVITY THROUGH KALADAN MULTIMODE TRANSPORT CORRIDOR
- - - - MERGING OF INDIA'S ACT EAST POLICY+ JAPAN'S FREE AND OPEN INDO - PACIFIC POLICY
        
        WHAT IS INDO PACIFIC?
        
        COOPERATION IN INDO-PACIFIC:
        
        BENEFITS<?
        
        1.IT WILL STRENGTHEN RULE OF AT LAW AND FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION: WHICH IS THREATENED BY CHINA AGGRESIVENESS REGARDING SOUTH CHINA SEA
        
        2.IT WILLL ENHANCE COOPERATION WITH JAPAN AND ASEAN COUNTRIES ... AND IT IS IN SYNC WITH INDIA ACT EAST POLICY
        
        IT IS IN CONCURENCE OF US PIVOT TO AISA POLICY
        
        WHAT<? BOTH COUNTRIES DECIDED TO MERGE THEIR MARITIME CORRIDORS: PACIFIC OCEAN AND INDIAN OCEAN
        
        IT WILL CREATE SYNERGY B/W INDIA'S ACT POLICY AND JAPAN'S FREE AND OPEN INDO PACIFIC STRATEGY
        
        AAGC
        
        COOPERATION IN AFRICA
        
        HOW<? : AAGC(ASIA AFRICA GROWTH CORRIDOR)
        
        WHAT<?JAPAN LOOKS TO INVEST NEARLY 200 BILLION .. THAT WILL TURN 21ST CENTURY FROM AN ASIAN CENTURY TO ASIAN -AFRICAN CENTURY
        
        JAPAN WILL PROVIDE STATE OF ART TECHNOLOGY AND INDIA WILL BRING ITS EXPERTISE OF WORKING IN AFRICA
        
        HOW AAGC IS DIFFRENT FROM OBOR?
        
        AAGC IS A SEA CORRIDOR WHILE OBOR IS A LAND CORRIDOR
        
        IT ATTEMPTS TO CREATE A FREE AND OPEN INDO-PACIFIC REGION, WHILE OBOR SOUGHT TO REVIVE OLD SILK ROAD LINKING CHINA WITH EUROPE
        
        AAGC WILL BE A CONSULTATIVE PROCESS WITH WOULD BE PROFITABLE AND BANKABLE, WHEREAS OBOR IS A GOVT. FUNDED PROJECT
        
        THIS OBOR AND AAGC ARE RELICS OF NEOLIBERALISM
        
        VIEW OF RAJIV BHATIA ON AAGC:
        
        IT SHOULD BE RECKENOED THAT INDIA AND JAPAN DON'T HAVE LUXARY OF TIME IN VIEW OF CHINA'S RAPIDLY EXPANDING FOOTPRINT IN AFRICA .....
        SO THERE IS URGENT NEED INCREASE SCOPE OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND ENGAGE PROACTIVEKY TO MAKE AAGC INTO A VIABLE REALITYU
        
        RECALIBRATE ASIN POWER BALANCE
  - - - WHAT <?: THIS STAGE IS REPAIRING OF RELATION AFTER INDIA 2ND NUCLEAR TEST @ POKRAN -II..
      - HOW REPAIRING? THIS STAGE SOME AD HOC COOPERATION IN DISASTER RELEIF FOLLOWING 2004 TSUNAMI
    - - WHAT <? :CONVERGENCE OF STRATEGIC INTEREST STARTED
      - HOW CONVERGENCE ? : CONCEPTUALISATION OF QUAD = US+ INDIA+JAPAN+ AUSTRALIA
        
        JAPAN GIVEN CONCEPT OF 2+2 DAILOGUE: B/W FOREIGN AND DEFENCE MINISTERS OF QUAD
      - BUT INDIA WAS HESITANT OF SUCH CONVERGENCE:
        
        WHY HESITANT?: NOT ONLY INDIA BUT AUSTRALIA BECOZ OF CHINESSE ISSUES
    - - WHAT <? CONVERGENCE OF COMMEN INTEREST AT REGIONAL LEVEL... WHERE THERE IS LESS HESITATION