Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
EARTHQUAKES (Waves (EQs occur as a series of events (Foreshocks, Main…
EARTHQUAKES
Waves
-
-
-
Release of stress that builds up in earth to reduce tension, compression or shearing
-
-
Move quickly thru rocks, but slower thru mud+ water = amplification
-
-
-
General Responses
- Deploy specialist teams ER hours/days
- Treat wounded + return to hospital
-
- Find + remove dead REHAB days/weeks
- Set-up tented camp + emergency kitchen
-
- Clear rubble with bulldozers
- Make an insurance claim RECON months/years
-
-
Amatrice, 2016
Key Facts
-
-
-
Shallow, 4.4km = little warning time
-
EQ occurred along a fault where EQs had previously occurred e.g. 2009 l'Aquilla - so should have been better prepared
-
-
-
Causes
-
-
Tyrrhenian Basin
To the west, Mediterranean Sea
-
-
Andria microplate
-
-
Formed the Apennines
Deposition of sediment on edge of land mass during SD = an accretionary wedge (Apennine fold mt belt)
Seismic Gap Theory
-
-
SGT states: segments of an active fault that have no slipped for a long time are most likely to experience an EQ, as that is where stresses build
-
Impacts
Long Term
-
Environmental
Long period of after shocks = continued damage - especially in weakened buildings + psychological effects
Political
School rebuilt in 2012 for €700,000 collapsed = local complaints about officials.
Money allocated by central gov. to create 'Safe Schools' in Apennine zone - 200,000 in risk zones
-
-
-
Short Term
-
Environmental
Destruction of homes, road infrastructure
-
Preparedness
-
-
-
-
New school rebuilt in 2012 costing €700,000 was destroyed, but a 13th century tower remained
Anti-seismic construction laws into '73 = wooden not concrete beams - but concrete beams still widely used
-
-
Early warning systems not deployed in this region - but would have been ineffective - no foreshocks, distance from epicentre to settlements was so short that there would have been no time to reach alarms
-
Responses
Short Term
Bulldozer, 12 helicopters (road accessible was difficult)
-
5,000 people responded in immediate aftermath (half were volunteers)
-
-
Survivors, rescue teams, sniffer dogs
Long Term
-
Over 600 restaurants across Italy put the local dish of Amatrice on the menu and donated €2/order to the Red Cross
Mitigation
-
Reduce Vulnerability
-
-
Community Preparedness
-
-
Night time - unprotected, asleep, no time to get to safety
Reduce Loses
Short-Term
-
12 helicopters, survivors, police, fire + rescue teams, sniffer dogs, 5000 people
-
-
-
-
-
Long-Term
-
Special Commissioner
-
-
Funding issues, corruption, illegal construction = obstruction of reinforcement of old buildings + application of seismic codes to new ones
Insurance
-
-
-
-
Would reflect the global move towards disaster risk education rather than paying for damage after the event
-
-
-
Tohoku, Japan, 2011
Vulnerability
Eurasian, Philippine Sea P, Pacific, N Am plates
-
-
-
Reclaimed land e.g. Kansai airport, industrial complexes, Tokyo harbour
-
-
-
Key Facts
-
Epicente 70km from Honshu Island, E Japan
-
-
-
-
Tsunamis
-
-
-
Overwhelmed Midway Atoll
Drowned 110,000 nesting birds in wildlife refuge
Impacts
Socio-Economic
Short-Term
-
-
45,000 buildings destroyed
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Long-Term
-
Cost of EQ, including reconstruction, estiamted at £185 bn
-
Power shortages + need to repair damage = many factories suspending production = shortage of parts may affects other areas of country + overseas = decline in ind. production
-
-
-
-
-
-
The scale of disaster reduced potential growth thru damage to tangible fixed assets, injury + death
Subsequent recon. efforts can boost output growth (supplementary budgets to finance reocn. will expand available fiscal resources)
Environmental
Short-Term
-
Tsunami drowned 110,00 nesting birds in wildlife refuge
-
Political
Short-Term
-
-
Criticism of relief efforts in NE (inadequate food, fuel, shelter)
Gov. reconstruction, tougher regulations, fired some officials
-
Long-Term
Subsequent recon. efforts can boost output growth (supplementary budgets to finance recon. will expand available fiscal resources)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Mitigation
Reduce Vulnerability
-
-
-
Gov. provided a widespread tsunami warning alerting people to get to high ground - survivors testify to effectiveness
-
-
Reduce Losses
00,000s military troops deployed in 72 hours
-
-
91 countries + 9 international orgs. offered help, inc. MICs
US
$100,000 in immediate aid
-
-
China provided $4.5 m humanitarian aid (blankets, tents, lights)
-
L-T: 5 years later
Socio-Economic
170,000 people remain in temp. housing
-
-
-
-
Political
-
arge new tsunami walls being built along the 400km coastline, 35ft high
Towns to be built on higher ground, away from the coastline
-
-
Monetary + fiscal stimulus has drawn construction capacity to Tokyo, where deals are more lucrative e.g. building stadium for Olympic Games
Landforms + Landscapes
-
-
Faults
-
-
-
Normal
-
-
-
-
Escarpments
-
- tension in released = EQs
- Movement along fault plane = scarp
- Unknown block may be displaced by a few cm/metres
- Greater the displacement along the fault, the greater the scarp
-
-
-
Movement along vertical(normal), horizontal or both
Haiti 2010
Why Live There?
-
-
Port-au-Prince
Lies on a plate border, but people chose to live there anyhow
-
-
Tectonic Setting
-
-
-
-
-
2008 - geologists thought this would happen, but could not predict when
-
EQ History
-
EQs continued along the fault, to the west, to Jamaica
-
Vulnerability
Environmental
-
Haiti experienced a tornado in September 2010 - killed 5 people + destroyed 6,000 emergency tents
-
-
-
Hazard/Facts
-
-
-
-
Foreshocks, main shocks + after shocks
-
-
Effects
4,700 schools destroyed - no school for year after
-
-
800,000 forced into 450 temp. camps - only 3 with portable water
-
73,000 burried in mass graves to prevent spread of disease
-
-
-
-
Reinforced roads terminated at corner of building, a high stress point = many buildings collapsed - 'pancake effect'
-
-
Development
AC: Amatrice
-
Cons
-
-
Some sites rebuilt illegally, without seismic controls
-
-