Was there a Social Revolution in the 1960s
Definition and characteristics of a social Revolution:
Revolution: "a forcible overthrow of a government or social order, in favor of a new system" --> also a reminder that a revolution contains successes and failures.
Social revolution: sudden change in the structure of society especially changes anticipated by socialists (or even communists).
Diagnosing the causes of a social revolution:
Revolutions may appear when a society is not working well meaning when a government is weak
--> allows revolutionaries to seize power.
Class struggle is also a major part in a revolution. The more. society is unequal the more it is inclined to experience a revolution.
shifts in culture can cause that change. Dominant cultural values or norms can be outdated or undesired and lead to a revolution --> in this chapter we can say that revolution occurred because of the war and the cultural values. The war was eye opening in a way especially regarding social division
Arguments Pro social Revolution: ✅
What is the basis of claims that there was a social revolution in the 60s :
Historian Marwick placed the social revolution in a specific timeline : 1958-1973 (beginning of 70s = end of Post war boom).
The characteristics of a new era (16 total)
Rebellious time : opposition to a former organization (characteristics of a revolution), formation of new subcultures.
Individualism = promoting free rights and liberty of action as well as independence of an individual.
*emergence of youth culture (better access to education, given more importance, given a voice, rebellious, protests, activists and constitute a market to themselves with music, magazines etc..)
Mass air travel --> and other technological advances: television which most people had thanks to economic growth which increased productivity therefore, living standards.
More tourism/International cultural exchange (reminder that Britain became a multicultural society).
Multiculturalism --> recognition of ethnic diversity: even though it was hard to accept : Powell (as mentioned after the war there was different type of immigration that led to a lot of discrimination yet it did bring new traditions and cooking habits to Britain thus changing the social order.
*development of the consumer's society, better supply
Segregation (concern emerged from the civil rights movement), issues with families and class.
Revolution in Elite culture, music and literature.
Liberal tolerance
Conservative backlash from older generations (unhappy angry people, they felt threatened by change)
Sexual liberation, permissiveness,legislation : divorce, and abortion
Women: access to better jobs and pay their rights were protected better.
Rock music : international language
1979 very conservative Prime minister = Thatcher people voted for her for economic reasons mostly (after all the failures on Labour's behalf)
she had Victorian values --> evidence of political setback. We can assume that people also voted for her because they disagreed with changes.The people who voted extreme right conservatives because they were unhappy with the social changes serves as evidence that there was in fact changes.
: because for people to be unhappy this means that there had been changes. However this is too speculative because we know Thatcher was not all that popular and that she was elected for economic reasons. Thatcher did not turn back the clock, Britain did not become like the 50s during the 80s when she was in power. In fact she didn't even touch any of the long term. Some things did not survive the 60s and 70s --> drug use were not so trendy and the sex revolution had died out --> it was more a phase of exploration and trends not relevant to display in social revolution because it was very temporary ---> though they did not vanish completely they were no longer part of the dominant society.
Trying to sum up the most significant changes in society :
- Television :people could observe change
- popular music rebellious universal language
-mass tourism and better loving standards e.g. car ownership --> enhanced change.
What are the characteristics of a social revolution
everyone had to feel it and agree on the fact that it was a unique decade showing evidence of change.
-Social change has to happen on the long term, makes it difficult to determine a unarguably a timeline.
-Social change needs to affect the population (needs to be universal) yet not everyone was affected in the 60s
Marwick believed there was a social revolution and even listed the changes that occurred thus proving that there was some kind of revolution.
There was an opposition to an established society
----> e.g. permissivenes yet these points are too specific when defining the
Women --> how did their lives change in the 60s, all the things they couldn't and can do now, jobs education there has been an evolution in their roles but this was a continuous process that WWII helped to accelerate. They were granted financial independence (did not need to rely on their husbands and had access to jobs) they were also protected by legislation from conjugal violence and harassment --> they were more important and benefitted society differently than looking after men. This protective system for women helped them especially regarding abuse, they could divorce a violent husband which was a positive change in their lives, they lived better lives. As previously mentioned the changes had taken place before already --> began in the 18th century. movements for equal rights and riots --> suffragettes came later beginning of 20th century so slow change. No matter the progress made it remains an issue having riots, laws and legislation has not solved all the problems permanently. --> there is right to vote, right to education and access any kind of job, equal pay act legislation passed --> the importance and need for change.
1 point: Looking at the characteristics of social revolution and the different arguments whether they are pro or contra we will be able to assess as history students whether or not we could safely speak of a revolution. The wisest thing to do is to look at which arguments are stronger and build our own opinion from there.
Arguments against a social Revolution: ❌
Some argue that the time period evoked is not rigorous because some of these changes such as female empowerment started even before WWI with the suffragette movement. This is evidence of continuity over change. The changes that were occurring in 1945 were delayed to the 60yet that still does make the 60s a unique decade (1st contradiction). Female empowerment was not the only change dating before the 60s --> immigration, multiculturalism.
The revolution did not affect all social classes (not universal) either which is another argument going against that idea. this social revolution mattered mostly to the educated middle class in urban areas. The change was mostly an urban phenomenon rural communities were less affected
Thatcher was set back : her policies resembled that of the 50s socially conservatives. Despite that she remained in Parliament for 20 years. This political setback also meant that the changes were not successful and did not last therefore we cannot affirm that there was social change. The middle class were the trend setters and eventually the social changes spread. --> some did not respond well to change and claimed that society was corrupt. However the has us question the idea of whether it was a revolution or an evolution because as mentioned previously in order to be a revolution it has to be effective at a large scale.
change and continuity are difficult to dissociate. However there still was change but it only affected a group instead of a whole population, it is not global enough therefore the conclusion to that point is that there wasn't exactly a social revolution.
Criticism regarding Marwick's view ⛔ There has been some significant changes that were also ling lasting: e.g. the importance of youth, the legislation for women, multiculturalism, technological advances tourism etc.. showing that there was a revolution but they are one arguments going against too:
Changes actually started before so continuity or evolution rather than changes and revolution, e.g. female empowerment --> began in WWI accelerated by WWII and pursued in the 60s but only reached a satisfying level in the 90s. Some even thought the social changes were a myth (a made up story that a society has in common)
Changes did not affect everyone difference in age, region and class, mostly affected the educated middle class in currant areas
the Social and cultural trends did not last long: Drugs and permissiveness decreased, Thatcher came along old school conservatism.
Conclusion ❤ with the already assessed elements: The events that occurred in the 60s happened to have some characteristics of a revolution for example rejection of cultural values and traditions, a long term impact leading us to contemplate whether we could talk of continuity or a revolution. However something crucial is not taken in account : the scale. --> we ought toe consider whether it was a revolution or an evolution.
a revolution means a radical change in mentality and ideology regarding society (in this context). the changes must take place fats and had a long term impact, I needs to affect the whole population and the changes have to be significant enough to change lives. Looking at the suppose revolution in the 60s, did it have a long term impact, was there a change who was affected, were the Thatcher years a set back. Changes seemed slow or hardly existent.
Youth 🏁: Result of the Baby boom led to a lot of teenagers, improvement in Education, the place of youth in society changed like that of women , more listening, more consideration they were finally given a voice, riots protests, activists and movements against the war in Vietnam. Abolition of censorship was a consequence of the youth movement. Education 1944 Butler Act, comprehensive schools, increased the age limit before leaving school. permitted wider education amongst the working class. Unis expanded = larger students pop. Education allowed youth to have a better place in society and express themselves better. 68 symbolic year for youth: protests against Vietnam war, segregation, nuclear weapons. protest reached its peak when the biggest took place in front if the US embassy (Grosvenor square), Europe's youth taken over by the May 68 protest in Paris, schools like LSE were taken by sit ins. trendy musicians at the time Bob Dylan and the Rolling Stones considered rebellious. Che Guevara famous Cuban revolutinary and every teenager had a poster of him on their wall. Nudity + swearing in theaters. --> "Hair", "oh Calcutta ". Late 60s color TV + advertising --> + for consumer's society. youth culture generated a lot of anger, evidence of important social change . Mary Whitehouse took in a lot of complaints and concerns about the emerging youth culture. To counter the idea of a revolution regarding youth culture there could be something countering because after a few complaints : permissiveness and trends of the time stopped : it was an important moment for your but not everything was long lasting : only higher education and the voice given to youth.
Immigration: something that undeniably impacted British society + - Britain hadn't had much immigrants in a while so legislation had to be passed (some groups of people felt threatened by these new arrivals). They changed throughout time e.g. immigrants in the 19th century were mostly European but that was no longer the case in the 60s. migrants looked physically different and stood out they a complete no culture and new cooking. strong reaction from the locals --> rejection riots and violence. conservatives passed legislation to stop discrimination and Labour passed 3 --> society was impacted. Britain became multicultural. Politicians used the issues with immigrants for political gain Powell "River of blood" speech, he was opposed to migrants from the commonwealth and against a multicultural society (he was a conservative.
the change in living standards after WWII --> improvement due to economic change (post-war boom). Youth had ore money and contributed to the economy, bought records and magazines --> became a market to themselves. More women worked + immigration leading to economic growth,. Welfare system also improved living standards.Free Healthcare = raise of life expectancy + benefits for unemployments and retirees). Living standards improved for everyone. Macmillan elected in 59 because of the affluent society. Low class owned televisions positive effect on people's lives : more productivity less hours of work more leisure, more money to spend (not exist before the war). increase in vaccines and healthcare low death rate.
Legislations: The 60s the start of a lot of legislation as previously mentioned, Roy Jenkins : Divorce. Legal changes , they reflected deep social changes, society was changing so that implied new legislations. In some cases legal changes came before the social ones e.g. abolition of death penalty --> a lot were opposed to that. Leaders led the pop. to better changes, absolute faith in politician especially on behalf of the less educated for whom politicians were extremely knowledgeable and aware --> this was how the abolishment of death penalty was accepted. There always was a correlation between what the people think and what the politicans elected think.. Jenkins felt strongly about the death penalty. Women given freedom and more rights: Divorce in 73, abortion in 67 and matrimonial property act in 70. abortion caused strong oppositions from religious groups but some women had safe abortions and others could die from it --> society was not fair.
Tolerance towards male homosexuality in 67 initiated by Labour Party --> put an end to discrimination though things were not entirely sorted on a social scale. legislation sustained or supported change which was promising.
Causes ♻
According to Marwick -- > what could have been the causes of this social revolution,
Structural changes (economic and social) :
Post war boom: Affluent society Macmillan elected
Impact of the Welfare state improved health and living standards, mortality rate decreased there was also benefits for retirees and the unemployment (positive to feed the consumer's society as well).
Baby boom --> A reason why there was a rise in youth a lot of children prosperous society, permissiveness and sexual freedom.
Technological advances (mass flight, television)
Ideological changes (politcal, social)
- Changing mentality towards women--> protected given more rights (Jenkins). The people's war planted the seed accelerated process of female empowerment and equal rights.
Changes started pre WWII were delayed but according to Marwick 60s was the decade that concluded or that continued this change. Marwick --> time of affluent society was the right time for the beginning changes to pursue.
how extensive were the changes Macmillan elected in 59 PM conservative one nation Tory. affluent society he ed his party to citron: slogan " you've never had I so good". his campaign relied on consumer prosperity. Work of cartoonist Vicky : Macmillan speaking to goods. In the first year he was elected a lot of social and political changes overtook the conservative party. Labour emerged again (never been more popular since WWII) --> Wilson younger different from Macmillan. anti establishment attitudes (standing opposites to the establishment of social political and economic values of society)--> nuclear disarmament against the Suez invasion. Profumo affair scandal, paving thhe way for sexual liberation, Labour Party elected in 64 --> in tune with the local changes.
Detailed examples of change among youth
Further information about Immigration. immigration before the war mostly coming from Eastern Europe the reasons were often religious. in the 16th century some French protestants migrated to Britain because of Catholic persecution. Irish laborers ,looking for abetter life migrated as well (internal migration however). European jews fleeing from Russia and Poland. Urban areas : a lot of discrimination towards migrants (reminder: they were not all that exotic til after the war). --> complaints about cultural differences, that the immigrants were overcrowding areas and increased the price of rent. Conservatives acted on this issue with the "Alien Act" in 1905: meant to limit to the entry of those that were financially self supportive and also to keep out. The reason for the conservatives to act upon the situation about migrants was to earn votes from the working class (financially more affected ?).
In 1919 --> other Alien Act: after the war, the rules tightened: immigrants needed a work permit before entering the country, deported if they caused trouble and register with the authority. 30s a lot Jews immigrating from Germany because of Nazi regime--> their number increased fast in 9 years (300,000). These immigrants however had been carefully selected according, to political ideas, wealth and skills (reminder of the selection when Germany was divided) they made valuable contribution during the war effort. Even though a lot of jewish immigrants were accepted there was still some anti Jewish feeling, like for any other type of migrants due to the belief that they were overcrowding, causing further unemployment (+ Taking jobs away from local people and poor housing.
This point of view is biased however because the dire economic situation (a lot of unemployment) during the interwar years was mostly due to the Great Depression rather than immigration and though Britain had acts passed, controlling the influx of migrants into their territory a lot of britons emigrated to the US, Canada or Australia (more Britons moved out rather than newcomers moved in).
After the war : full employment and a labour shortage so the Labour gov. recruited "displaced persons" (some lived in displacement camps in Europe) : from the Balkans and East Europe: Poles, Latvians, Estonians etc and also Belgians and Italians --> people who were forced out of their homelands (conflict: Result of WWII). Some were in camps and others had succeeded in coming to Britain and just stayed.
They were very helpful in the process of reconstruction. The Attlee government passed the Nationality act allowing all members of the Commonwealth to enter Britain : A lot of West Indians joined and Jamaicans too. They commonly worked as doctors or nurses for the new NHS (remember chapter on consensus) or as public transport workers. More advertisement for members of the commonwealth like India and Pakistan (workers in textile industries) to come and work in England, since Labour shortage continued in the 50s --> migrants worked in firm and businesses. 30,000 migrants came to England each year on average.
There was a lot of immigration in the 60s, it increased fast and considerably. This was due to rumors that the government was planning on restricting immigration. In the 70s there was much less immigration. 1971: 2 million non whites living in Britain.
2/ 3 came from the Commonwealth and the rest were non whites born in Britain (yet it was a very tiny proportion).
Restriction of immigration : gov:
received w/ hostility , they were blames for shortage of jobs and housing. Issues related to race--> Liverpool + Birmingham protest against blacks. There was concern on the gov.'s behalf that the immigrants were going to take too many jobs and if their was a high rate of unemployment among immigrants this meant a lot of expenses for government so they cut the influx, reduced immigration considerably.
Conclusion on immigrants:
immigrants before WWI were mostly European and came for either religious/ political or economic reasons, bearing in mind that during the interwar years and even before a lot of Britons migrated elsewhere. Migrants were never fully accepted or well received though they were of valuable help during and after the war. Before hand the conservatives passed an act limiting entry to certain migrants : They were often to blame for overcrowding, increase in rent and unemployment though other factors were responsible too. After the war the Nationality Act has led to more "exotic" migrants, Labour effectively faced the labor shortage by bringing in some displaced people and allowing more immigration.
The different acts: Macmillan in 62: Commonwealth Immigrants Act restricting the n° of immigrants tolerated in England, they could enter the country if they had family there already if they had skills that would benefit the nation or evidence that they already had a job to come to--> this act was necessary due to building up tensions between communities yet it w-was heavily criticized by Labour and the Liberal party: it was seen as racist because there was no restriction for immigrants outside of the commonwealth.
Even though Labour was against the Act Wilson tightened the restrictions because thats what the population wanted. some communities were forced to move out in 68 Asians forced out of Kenya had to move to Canada etc... Because Britain was trying to recur the immigration coming from West Africa.
Powell's "rivers of blood" speech, both political parties supported the CI Act passed by Parliament during the Crisis with the Kenyan Asians. Powell go in trouble for this speech --> sacked by then PM, Heath, demonstration in airports supporting Powell.
conservative elections in the 70s helped by the slogan "keep Britain White"
Edward Heath Immigration Act in 1971 passed --> limited entry to people from the commonwealth (supposed to be opposed to it ???). Those who failed to prove they had close relations w/ people in Britain. they couldn't bring people form their own family. The gov. did make exceptions on humanitarian grounds. e.g. When asians expelled from Uganda, 29,000 accepted in Britain despite Powell's opposition --> resigned and left the Party.
Thatcher in 1980 had a Nationality Act: New requirements for British citizenship. Being born not enough, need evidence that family member= British. Today Britain is the strictest country in the EU concerning immigration.
Race Relations: Not comparable to the US in terms of anger and violence (though there was some tension and violence but mostly shortly before and after the war --> anti black riots).
All immigrants had civil rights. There was still racism : some refused to grant them jobs/ houses others refused to serve non-white customers. Whites felt threatened because less and less Jobs and houses : more hostility. Tense Relation w/ the police.
Contrasting interpretations: gov. limited immigration people saw it as a way to protect the population whereas the gov. was trying to prevent discrimination. TU N° 1 complainers about Black taking their jobs.
Black and Asian immigrants triggered a lot of resentment in cities-->streets white and colored workers were sharing. The 1st immigrants who arrived between 1945 and 1960 were well integrated (mostly from Europe not too culturally different) --> non White immigrants were targeted instead.
A lot of violence the Notting Hill (1958) being the most memorable one --> 140 arrests and the government seemed more kind to the non-Whites and promoted racial harmony --> things went from bad to worse leading to important restrictions.
Against non-white immigration : Enoch Powell --> pro limited immigration of non-white people --> their can be no harmony there will be closing between communities (compared it to the fall of the Roman empire with the rivers of blood) --> nothing good could come out from this. He was sacked by Heath eventually.
National Front and BNP: campaigned for a while Britain. They failed to win any seat in Parliament. Yet 93 one member of the BNP elected other politicians dismayed by that.
Pro Harmony: Labour Party tried to improve tension problems, Media and population = hostile towards the non-whites. the government knew they couldn't do much about it but they tried to influence attitudes non-the less. Thus acts were introduced: * Race Relations Act 1965 : faire treatment for non-whites. People taken to court if ever proven to be racist (discriminating in public places). It applied to those who refused to serve colored at bars etc.. it did not apply for housing and jobs (strangely the highest level of discrimination in this field). Race Revolution Act 1968 : (community relations commission) keep an eye on mixed areas, cannot discriminate in services. --> no more progress under Heath (the 3rd act came later). Race Relations Act 1976 (Commission for Racial equality replaced the Race Relations Board) encourage better relations between people of different races. Racial hatred was punished by law. The authorities didn't have to apply this act because it could lower their morale
Were these acts effective: Commission : excellent work but slow. Thatcher (set back) development not so good, more difficult for non-whites to find jobs. Very unhappy the minorities had built up resentment--> violent protests. Some minorities (asian) suffered harassment --> insults written on houses, vandalized threatened. Police were not serious about protecting these people. 93 Black Labour MP considered it better for immigrants to return home, it would take generations for things to move on and to reach harmony. However positive aspect: multiculturalism, music traditions, cooking habits brought a lot to sports business success and writing--> Notting hill carnival (Caribbean Identity + largest carnival in Europe
Liberalization of censorship when it came to sexual content "Lady Chatterly's lover" pulled out of the shelves but the complain didn't got through --> evidence of change in mentalities "private eye" paper start of satire, theaters began to feature more nudity and swearing (homosexuality too). 62 change in Music, Beatles, Rolling Stones --> young music for young people a message of permissiveness and rebellion. Music created a mass youth market : important consumers, magazines, cinema and music --> became a universal language. Hobsbawn believed that music was made popular by youth purchasing the records --> however some musicians like Elvis came before the beginning of the "social revolutions" showing that the emergence of popular music had not been triggered by the youth in the 60s.