Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Ciência da Informação e Ecologia Digital (Digital Memory (Projetos e…

- - - - digital ecology as a socially smart cybercontroller
- - - - Digital Platforms are just another means o human interaction: they need adequate values and incentives embedded in their fabric.
- - - - The information professions: knowledge, memory, heritage (Bates, 2015)
      - Information as Thing (Buckland, 1991)
      - Documents, Memory Institutions
        and Information Science (Hjørland, 2000)
  - - - Digital librarianship is still a field “characterized by a high degree of uncertainty, [and] new entrants in the field, which could serve as sources of innovation and variation, [seeking] to overcome the liability of newness by imitating established practices within the field” [4, p. 156]. Therefore, the innovation processes will encounter resistance or attempt to conform to the legitimate (established) practices.
      - The classic literature on social memory and cultural heritage recognizes the agency of institutions and technologies of reproduction in shaping cultural memory [7–13]. It also demonstrates the dynamic nature of cultural change in which institutional memory processes are characterized by invention within constraints of legitimacy defined by present concerns of social groups [14–18].
      - Studying how digital libraries are involved in the production of knowledge is crucial to our understanding of how memory institutions are currently shaping this record in the digital environment. The implications for that understanding are far-reaching because the traditional role of memory institutions in shaping a society’s view of its own identity, of its heritage and its past, has been at the center of the arguments concerning those institutions’ legitimacy.
        
        With the changing technology, the institutions are also undergoing transformation in terms of rethinking their collections, users, and access.
        
        Memory institutions have been the legitimate producers of culture and identity, the official repositories of common culture. They have a regulated (legitimate) and regulative effect (legitimating) in society. The fixed object orders of the past—in the museum, the archive, and the library—represent shared memories of a society. It is reasonable to consider digital libraries to be developing under assumptions of continuity, with the existing memory institutions maintaining and building shared memories.
    - - USLibraries
        
        A distributed library: Integration and collaboration
        
        The projects not only integrate materials from different collections at this institution, but some of them are developed in partnership with public libraries and universities, thus creating new uses for the existing resources. If this paradigm prevails, collaborative efforts could become standard practice in developing digital collections around a subject or a regional focus.
        
        The living library: Tapping into community memory
        
        a trend of linking digital libraries to communities, thus reestablishing a democratic purpose of the library as traditionally conceived in U.S. society
        
        Maintaining continuity: Antiquarian traditionalism.
        
        The organizing principles for collections traditionally evolved around a genre or, more organically, documents brought together because they relate to personal or institutional activities. When automatically applied, the systems that work in a paper-based environment may be detrimental for digital environments. Even when these online collections are extensive, the display and retrieval mechanisms are too crude and the size of these collections are insufficient to serve the traditional scholarly purposes of sustained, rigorous, and systematic research.
        
        We may hypothesize that the ability of university libraries to diffuse their model rests on advanced technologies for digital library development coupled with the legitimacy of university spe- cialists as innovators. Yet, the usability of these online collections does not extend the original mission of these institutions.
    - - slakdjflsdf
  - - - [Europeana] tem facilitado a colaboração inovadora e a transferência de conhecimento entre as instituições de memória da Europa. O resultado é um novo espírito de empresa colaborativa que está viabilizando a sustentabilidade de um espaço informacional europeu. (Europeana 2011:4)
      - o reconhecimento de que a infraestrutura da Internet tem implicações incontornáveis para as coleções do patrimônio cultural não se traduzem em impacto natural e imediato na estrutura e nos processos das 'instituições de memória' (museus, bibliotecas e arquivos).