Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

POS ( (hermenautics (7 principles (1.continueously moving back and…

- - - - science of nature #
        
        explain
        
        law based causal
        
        outside the head
      - human sciences
        
        understand
        
        why they do
        
        inside the head
        
        scientist plays part part
        
        relive / expereince fx. ancient civilizations
        
        looking from different angles
    - - iterative
        
        part / whole
        hermenautical circle/spiral
        
        ending circle
        good gestalt
        no contradictions
        confirms idea
        
        human understanding take place
      - inferences
        
        arguments
        
        premis->conslusion
        
        deduction #
        
        induction #
    - - preunderstanding
        prejudice
        
        gain knowledge aware of
        preunderstanding influence
        
        our view will be influenced by prejudice
        
        create a new understanding
        
        merge horizon
        
        strict method to challenge own
        preunderstanding
        
        warheit und metode
    - - blank blackboard
    - - sieve
    - - 1.continueously moving back and forth
      - 2.The interpretation is done when a good
        gestalt is reached
      - 3.Testing the parts as I work with the subject
      - 4.The autonomy of the subject
      - 5.Knowledge in the subject
      - 6.Consciousness about my own subjectivity
      - 7.Every understanding is better understanding
  - - - a=b, b=c => a=c
      - already known
      - always true
    - - not necesarely true
      - learn unknown / truly new
  - - - humans aree here to observe the world
      - prove thesis false or true
      - submit result to test / repetition by others
      - labarotories
      - thesis->prediction->experiment->observation circle #
        
        confirm true/false
        
        repeat to create inductive argument
        
        repeatability
      - scientist unimportent
    - - falsifiable
        
        to set up differncies
        
        religion #
        
        simulated reality
      - science / pseudo science
      - problem->research->
        ( thesis -> prediction -> experiement(prototype) -> observation(test) ) -> conclusion(solve/not solve problem)
      - claim
        
        logical asymetri
        
        ex. black swan / all swans white / exists a non-white swan
    - - paradox
        
        finetuning of anormaliy
        
        discribed as contradiction
      - abnormality
        
        out of the usual
      - normaility
      - plannig
        
        the goal is known
        but dont have solution
      - problem type
      - subhect / problem area / definition
    - - premise 1:covering law (secondary research)
        premis 2: particular fact / data (primary research)
        conclusion: thesis
  - - - credibility (currency)
      - not necesarely th etruth
      - language money aplplying power
      - latour
      - language game (sprog spil)
        
        weights
        
        balance
      - prestige
    - - symbolic capital
      - fields
        
        science
        
        politics
        
        culture
        
        fat vs thin
        
        little vs tall
        
        financial
        
        influencing each other