Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
A 15 Point Checklist for Good Thematic Analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006)…
A 15 Point Checklist for Good Thematic Analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006)
(Vossler & Moller, 2006, p. 196)
A. TRANSCRIPTION
- The data have been transcribed at an appropriate level of detail, and the transcripts have been checked against the tapes for 'accuracy'
B. CODING
- Each data item has been given equal attention in the coding process
- Themes have not been generated from a few vivid examples (an anecdotal approach), but instead the coding process has been thorough, inclusive, and comprehensive
- All relevant extracts for each theme have been collated
- Themes have all been checked against each other and back to the original data set
- Themes are all internally coherent, consistent and distinctive
C. ANALYSIS
- Data have been analysed - interpreted, made sense of - rather than just paraphrased or described
- Analysis and data match each other - the extracts illuminate the analytic claims
- Analysis tells a convincing and well-organised story about the data and topic
- A good balance between analytic narrative and illustrative extracts is provided
D. OVERALL
- Enough time has been allocated to complete all phases of analysis adequately, without rushing a phase or giving it a once-over-lightly
E. WRITTEN REPORT
- The assumptions about, and specific approach to, thematic analysis are clearly explicated
- There is a good fit between what you claim you do, and what you show you have done - i.e. described method and reported analysis are consistent
- Langauge and concepts used in the report are consistent with the epistemological position of the analsis
- The researcher is positioned as active in the research process; themes do not just 'emerge'