Credible & Reliable
Question #3 - Is There Bias?
Question #1 - Who Is The Author?
Question #4 - When Was It Made?
Question #2 - Is The Information Accurate?
Notes #1: The fist source is a pdf and I didn't see an authors name, but the second website has an .org in the website URL. The first link doesn't look like a credible pdf but it really is. You would think that the second source is credible like the first one, but it's not. If you click on any of the extra links, they are all fake and end in a "SCAM WARNING".
Notes #4: At the first look of the first article, I can already tell which one is more reliable than the other. The first website has a .gov URL, and the second website has a .org URL. Because the first website ends with a .gov URL it seems the most trustworthy. Plus, the first website was made this year in 2017, it is the most recent information. The second website ends with a .org URL, which is also trustworthy but doesn't look as professional as the first website. But, the second website was also made this year in 2017, so it is also has the most recent information.
Notes #3: The first website looks more trustworthy than the first website because there is a .gov in the URL. .gov is the more trustworthy URL because it means that a government source made the website. It also has the best and more credible facts.
Notes #2: Both of the websites are for children and both are about animals. If one of the websites has wrong information about animals than to find the correct information on a specific animal, I would search it on the internet and find the more correct answer. On the first website, there are lots of likes to click on. I clicked on most of them and all of them work fine and give me more information. The website URL is a .com, it wouldn't be the first chose but it would work fine. The second website also has lots of links and is also has a .com in the URL. Again, not the most credible.
Question #5 - Are All of The Websites Given Credible & Reliable?
Notes #5: The first website that I listed is credible because it was updated 25 days ago of this year, 2017. The first website is also reliable because the author that wrote the article can be contacted in many more ways than one. Even though the websites URL is .com, it is still a credible and reliable. The second website that I listed is credible because an article is written and posted every day of the week, and these article are written by a company names AAAS. The second website is reliable because that websites articles were/are written by a company. Also, the URL in the website was a .org. .org is one of the most credible websites URL's.
Website Info: The authors name is clearly stated under the title of the author. The author of this article is Phil Hall. The website is also credible and reliable because the article was updated about 30 days ago this year. You can also contact the author of this article by Twitter, Email, and the Internet. Also, the author of this article has also written over 100 other articles.
Website Info: First this article is credible, reliable, and trustworthy because the article was written this year, there a .org in the URL, and all of the articles included in the websites were all written this year. Also, articles are being written daily with credible information.
Website Info: First The New York Time magazines and articles are the most know articles and magazines known to man, or to most people for that matter. In sports articles whoever is writing the article has an opinion on which team they think in better. They will write positive bias about the team they like better. Also, they will write negative bias about the other team that they don't like.
Website Info: To answer the question, when was the website made, it was made this year (2017). This website was made by a professional company and gives pros and cons about the best cameras. So, with a the website being made by a company, it most likely means that that the website is trustworthy, credible, and reliable. This website is trustworthy because a company made the website. This website is credible because it was made this year in 2017. Also, this website is reliable because it is giving an opinion about what cameras have the best quality.
Notes #5: The third website I listed is credible because the articles are written every day just like the last website. The third website is also reliable because Everyone knows or has heard of The New York Times articles, and even though the website URL is .com, the website still has good information on it. The fourth and final website is credible because the website was updated later this year. Also, this fourth website is reliable because the information is more recent, and the company of the article gave opinions on the "best" cameras. Even though the website URL is a .com, the information is still helpful for finding the "best" camera, with pros and cons of each camera.