3.2 note
systematic view
formal
well-defined process
search in ACM DL and PubMed is difficult
meta-analysis
research review
set of statistical tools for comparing and contrasting measures
take into account publication bias
can be anything
no paper escaped you
difficult to make everything is covered
gis b a person author -> quantitative -> number
qualitative -> quality of data
find a theme
procedures for systematic review of qualitative of data
take part of an experiment -> learn by being part of it
how can you say people when all you are testing is students
phycology -> white female
get data from outside student bubbles
behavior
actual
self-reported
tricky
hawthorne effect
observer effect