Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

Historia 1 (Lektion 38 (Source critism (Narrative aspect (The four…

- - - - People can lie without meaning to lie
      - People memories can change over time
      - Primary sources
        
        They saw the actual event
      - Assessing the truth of what someone writes or says
      - Secondary sources
        
        This is not used for the narrative aspect but it is someone who has hear from the primary source
        
        Be careful of the time critical, a source that is later produced than another can still have the same primary source.
      - Statements
        
        Factual
        
        True or false
        
        Valuative
        
        Opinions, ethical view points
        
        Values can feel like factual
        
        Interpretive explanations
        
        Someone tries to make sense of what they witness, why did it happen
        
        Mix of factual and evaluative statements
        
        Explanation can contain both factual and evaluative statement
        
        Where, who
      - The four criteria
        
        Time criterion/Tidskriteria
        
        When the source is produces in relation when the historical event happened
        
        The source can be good a time after the event because the person could reflect after. But the person can also forgot things
        
        The rule is that the closer a source is to the event, the better
        
        Dependency criterion/Beroende kritarie
        
        Several sources with the same information that are not connected with eachotherhighs the dependency of the source
        
        Bias criterion/Tendens
        
        Identify what values and what values is influxes in the facts. In the source expressing its own personal views on the event?
        
        For example, racism, a text can be influenced by racism because that is the writers bias
        
        You need to find out the bias so you can see the facts
        
        Reasonableness criterion/Rimlighetskriteria
        
        Wether or not what there saying seems likely to have happened , for example if 100 people say these saw a witch it is not so likely that was true
        
        This is the one criteria that can change with time
        
        You need to be balanced between these criteria, you can't just check of all, you need to come back to all the criteria all the time
      - You working like a lawyer, you listen what people have to say and review it
    - - Objects, for example a book
    - - Type
      - Creator
      - Purpose
      - Authenciticity
    - - Factual knowledge
      - Skills
      - Understanding
      - Intuition
- - - - We using history in some way, with a goal in our mind. We use history as a tool to get to something.
    - - Scientific
        
        Be as objective as possible. The goal is to understand the past.
      - Existential
        
        Find meaning threw something that happened in the past
      - Pedagogical
        
        Used much in school
      - Revisionist
        
        Dinned things that happened or ignore them. They don't care about proof or source critisism.
      - Political
      - Moral/Etical
        
        Example of something that happened in the past and say if it is good or wrong.
      - Ideological
        
        There is some ideological use of history in school. That is to make us better citicents.
      - Commercial
        
        Using history in commercial or movie
    - - WHO is using history?
      - WHY are they using history?
      - WHAT are some examples from the source that support our explanations?
    - - What was it like to be a slave?
        Why was Sweden involved in this trade?
        How is slavery today similar and different from slavery in the 19th century?