Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
(Event Sequence (1974 Morton Thiokol is awarded contract to build solid…
Event Sequence
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
January 27 1986 Engineers and managers at Morton Thiokol discuss weather conditions with NASA managers and Marshall Space Flight Center. Several engineers expressed their concerns about the low temperatures would have on the rubber O-rings and recommended the launch be postponed
Managers from Morton Thiokol later agree with managers from NASA that the launch proceed as scheduled
January 28 1986 At 11:38 am the Space Shuttle Challenger (STS-51-L) took off from the launch pad at Cape Canaveral, Florida. Five Astronauts and two payload specialists were on board.
-
-
-
-
System Parts
-
People
-
-
-
-
Manufacturers/designers
Cacciabue (2004) Systems behave and respond via the automation and follow the rules and principles provided by their designers
-
-
-
-
-
Design Life Cycle
Concept detailed design
O-rings
DESIGN FAILURE-PRE CONDITION In 1985, post flight analysis discovered worst o-ring damage
-
-
-
-
-
Operating
-
-
-
Function
Ericson (2015) states that safety concerns during this phase include operator actions, hardware failure, hazardous system designs and safe design changes and system upgrades
-
-
-
Maintenance
-
-
-
-
-
repairs
*DESIGN FAILURE TO ENSURE FAILSAFE SYSTEMS WERE INCLUDED Did not cancel shuttle flights until the joints could be redesigned.
Design flaws
FAILURE TO RECOGNISE MISMATCH WITH O-RINGS AND COLD TEMPERATURE Srinvasan & Halada (2012) states that the primary causes of engineering disasters are usually considered to be human factors, design flaws, material failures, extreme conditions and a combination of these reasons
People
Individual factors
Roger Boisjoly
DESIGN FAILURE Engineer from Morton Thiokol knew there was a problem with the shuttle rocket boosters since 1977. Expressed concerns about shuttle launch in lowest temperatures. Argued that cold weather would exaggerate the problems of joint rotation and delay o-ring seating.
-
Flight crew
5 astronauts, 2 payloads including a school teacher
George Hardy
Was 'appalled' when Morton Thiokol engineers argued that Space Shuttle Challenger shouldn't fly in such cold temperatures (Berkes, H 2016)
Team Factors
-
NASA managers
ACTIVE FAILURE/ MANAGEMENT POLICY/ PROCEDURE FAILURE Went against all warnings from engineers about concerns regarding low temperatures and o-rings
Morton Thiokol managers
-
LATENT FAILURE Engineer from Morton Thiokol knew there was a problem with the shuttle rocket boosters since 1977
Ericson (2015) explains that in order to proactively design safety into a product, it is essential that the safety process start at the concept definition phase and continue throughout the life cycle.
-
-
-
Workplaces
Workplace factors
Pressure to launch
Economic considerations, political pressures and scheduling backlogs
-
-
Equipment design
-
Most complex of the six shuttle orbiters constructed by NASA (Gebhardt,C 2011)
-
Work environment
-
Ice on launch pad
An ice team had worked through the night to remove ice from the launch pad, yet engineers still expressed their concern
-
Management
-
-
Information transfer
-
-
Raval (2014) states that there was a lack of understanding in some of NASA's highest ranking managers
-
-
-