CH 10 -Com sci

SEX, LIES & ADVERTISING

OBJ: Critically analyse which, if any, of Steinem's anecdotes (story) surprise you the most and discuss why this is the case

Intro: 1990 memoir - recalls the days as the founding editor of Ms. Magazine in 1982.


As she explains it, the idea of sponsoring a magazine that explored women's issues seriously struck many advertisers as exceedingly strange.


One could make a case that the financial pressures on magazines today are so profound that the pressures to appeal to advertisers are greater than ever.


The press is subtly controlled by advertisers.


Even news magazines use soft cover stories to sell advertising, confuse readers with advertorials & occasionally self-censor on topics that could be problematic for big advertisers.

Ms. was the only women magazine that did not supply what he ad world euphemistically described as supportive editorial atmosphere or complementary copy
(e.g. articles that praise food/fashion/beauty subjects to support & complement food/fashion/beauty ads)


  • If Time & Newsweek has to lavish praise on cars in general & credit General Motors in particular to get GM ads, there would be a scandal. When women's magazines from 17 to Lear's praise beauty products in general & credit Revlon in particular to get ads, it is business as usual.

Why we need advertising:

⭐ Keeping the price of a feminist magazine low enough for most women to afford.


⭐ Providing a forum where women & advertisers could talk to each other & improve advertising itself.

Ms. would seek out the best adverts. The magazine was very specific in what it wanted.


Nothing new: Ebony & Essence were asking for ads with positive black images. Clearly, what Ms. needed was a very special publisher & ad sales staff.

Media reports on Ms. often insist that our unprofitability must be due to reader disinterest. The myth that advertisers simply follow readers is very strong.


Nothing causes ad-flight like the smell of non-success.

Estee Lauder Example:

"Ms. isn't appropriate for His ads, because Estee Lauder is selling a kept-women mentality"


BUT
60% of the users of His products are salaried, and generally resemble Ms. readers.


Estee Lauder has the appeal of having been started by a creative & hard-working woman.


"That doesn't matter, he says. He knows his customers, and they would like to be kept women. That's why he will never advertise in Ms."

Do you think that advertisers make decisions based on solid research?


-Ever since Ladies Magazine debuted in Boston in 1828, editorial copy directed to women has been informed by something other than its reader's wishes.


There were no ads then, but in an age when married women were legal minors with no right to their own money, there was another venue source to be kept in mind: husbands.
husbands may rest assured that nothing found in these pages shall cause his wife to be less assiduous in preparing for his reception or encourage her to usurp-station or encroach upon prerogative of men.

Most women's magazines avoid politics & rarely take a stand & praise socially approved lifestyles.


Avoid the hot topics of its day: slavery abolition, and women's suffrage.


By the time suffragists finally won the vote in 1930, women's magazines had become too entranced as catalogues, with main function to create a desire for products, teach how to use products, and make products a crucial part of gaining social approval, pleasing a husband & performing as a homemaker.

The male-imitative, dress-for-success woman carrying a briefcase became the media image of a woman worker, even though a blue collar woman's salary was often higher than her glorified secretarial sister's & though women at a real briefcase level are statistically rare. Needless to say, these dress-for-success women were also thin, white and beautiful.

Following are recent typical orders to women magazines:

  • Clairol stipulates that ads be placed next to a full page of compatible editorial
  • The De Beers diamond company, a big seller of engagement rings, prohibits magazines from placing its ads next to hard news or anti love/romance themed editorial
  • Procter & Gamble ads were not to be placed in any issue that included any material on gun control, abortion, the occult, cults or the disparagement of religion. Any issue covering sex or drugs, even for educational purposes.

These claims lead to an overall look of beauty & fashion in magazines where women are made up, dressed, retouched. Article on less-than-cheerful topics tend to be short & unillustrated.


Point is to be upbeat

Often editorial becomes one giant ad. When revlon was not placed as the first beauty ad in one Hearst magazine, Revlon pulled its ads from all Hearst magazines.


Advertisers want to know two things.
-What you are going to charge me?
-What else are you going to do for me?


More magazines are more bottom-line oriented because they have been taken over by companies with no interest in publishing. I also think advertisers do this to women's magazines especially because of the general disrespect they have for women.


  • Vanity fair published a profile on one major advertiser, Ralph Lauren, illustrated by the same photographer who does his ads, and turned the lifestyle of another, Calvin Klein, into a cover story.


  • Films & books, producers are beginning to depend on payments for displaying products in movies and books are now being commissioned by companies like Federal Express.

PART 3:
What could women's magazines be like if they were as free as books? As realistic as newspapers? As creative as films? as diverse as women's lives?
-We don't know.

You & I could:
🔥 Write to editors & publishers that we are willing to pay more for magazines with editorial independence


🔥 Write to advertisers that we want fiction, political reporting, consumer reporting - whatever is, or is not, supported by their ads.


🔥 Put as much energy into breaking advertising's control over content as into changing the image in ads, or protesting ads for harmful products like cigarettes.


🔥 Support only those women's magazines & products that take us seriously as readers & consumers.

There are many studies showing that the greatest factor in determining an ad's effectiveness is the credibility of its surroundings. The higher the rating of editorial believability, the higher the rating of the advertising.

Check out Prezi