Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
rohingya crisis: indian stand (is there obligation on india? (not a…
rohingya crisis:
indian stand
if we accept refugees?
why?
humanitarian reasons
international image
as largest democracy
as major power in region
india traditionally took a lenient
view towards refugees
1980s 90s refugees from myanmar
tibetan refugees
political asylum
government in exile
chakma-hajongs
srilankan tamils
why not?
north east : sensitive region
cultural rights of th minorities in NE
terrorism
relation between hardline rohingya millitants
and other terrorist groups
opening up indian land as
a safe haven for terrorism?
relation with myanmar will be affected
what will rohingya receive here?
joblessness
living in slums
health crisis
education?
quality of life
is there obligation on india?
not a signatory of 1951
convention on refugees
or its protocol
principle of non refoulement
No Contracting State shall expel or return ('refouler') a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where his life or freedom would be threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion
article 33 of 1951 convention
exceptions
persons guilty of war crimes,
crimes against peace or humanity
2 HCs have included
non refoulement in principle to
be followed
article 14 and article 21
extends to non citizens