Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
INDO - US (INTRODUCTION: (ANALYSIS OF STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP (BUT IT WOULD…
INDO - US
INTRODUCTION:
OFFICIAL RELATION:
INDIA-US ARE
STRATEGIC PARTNERS
SINCE 2010 INDIA AND US ARE HAVING INSTITUTIONAL STARTEGIC DAILOGUE
5 PILLARS OF STRATEGIC DAILOGUE:
DEFENSE AND STRATEGIC ISSUES
ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE
S&T
HEALTH AND INNOVATION
EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT
IN 2015 IT EXTENDED TO STRATEGIC NAD COMMERCIAL PARTNERSHIP
COMMENTARY ON INDO US STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP:
ACC. TO
DENNIS KUX:
INDIA-US RELATIONSHIP HAS TRAVELLED A LONG ROAD....
SINCE THE TIMES WHEN INDIA AND US WERE TERMED AS
ESTRANGED DEMOCRACIES TO STRATEGIC PARTNERS
ACC. TO DAVID MALON:
US AND INDIA WERE DESCRIBED AS PROVERBIAL: BLINDMAN AND ELEPHNAT
TRYING TO UNDERSTAND EACH OTHER
ACC. TO
HARSH v PANT:
RELEXIVE ANTI-AMERICANISM IS NO MORE EVIDENT IN NEW DELHI
REFLEXIVE ANTI-AMERICANISM:
NAM REMAINED THE BASIC FRAMEWORK OF INDIA'S FOREIGN POLICY
HOWEVER DURING COLD WAR NON-ALINGMENTNON-ALINGMENT BECAME: REFLEXIVE ANTIAMERICANISM
AT THE END OF COLD WAR
VARIOUS FACTOR PUSHED INDIA AND US TO COME TOGETHER
BUT INDIA PREFER STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP RATHER THAN STATUS OF ALLY
ACC. TO
FORMER AMBASSADOR KANWALSIWAL:
THERE IS CLARITY ON PART OF US WHAT IT WANTS FROM INDIA:
USA SEES INDIA AS A IDEAL SWING STATE AGAINST CHINA
USA SEES HUGE MARJET OF INDIS
ANALYSIS OF STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP
ORIGIN : TERM WAS DEVISED BY INDIA TO DESCRIBE ITS ALINGMENT WITH USSR IN 1971
SO THAT NAM PHILOSOPHY IS NOT COMPROMISED
no security doctrine of india
SO INTERPRETATION OF STRATEGIC DOCTRINE REMAINS AMBIGIOUS
THROUGH STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP:
INDIA TRIES TO PLAY SAFE B/W US, RUSSIA, AND CHINA
AND EXTRACT FROM THE: DTT: DEFENSE, TRADE, AND TECHNOLOGY
SO THERE IS NOTHING STRATEGIC IN THIS STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP.. IT IS MORE TRANSACTIONAL(ECONOMIC ORIENTED)
BUT IT WOULD NOT BE APPROPRIATE IF INDIA CONSIDERS ITSELF AS A NATURAL ALLY OF ANY COUNTRY
BECOZ INDIA'S SIZE LOCATION, GEOSTRATEGIC ENVIRONMENT DOESN'T ALLOW INDIA TO GO FOR ALINGMENT
ACC. TO C RAJAMOHAN:
MUTIPLE ALINGMENTS + STRATEGIC AUTONOMY
REMAINS THE BEST OPTION FOR INDIA
ACC. TO RAKESH SOOD:
present world order is
neither hegemonic nor multipolar
HOWEVER INDIA'S FOREIGN POLICY TODAY NEEDS LESS RED LINES AND GREATER AGILITY & PRAGMATISM TO SEEK ITS PLACE IN AGE OF UNCERTAINITY
INDIA IS TOO BIG
TOO PROUD
TOO ARGUMENTATIVE
TO PLAY A JUNIOR PARTNER ROLE OF ANY COUNTRY
ACC. TO NANDAN UNNIKRISHNAN:
NO ONE IS GOING TO PULL INDIA'S CHESTNUT OUT OF FIRE FOR INDIA.. INDIA HAS TO DEVELOP ITS OWN STRATEGY
EVOLUTION OF INDO-US RELATION:
BEFORE INDEPENDENCE: NEHRU INCLINED TOWARDS SOCIALISM- HELD THAT AMERICAN IMPERIALISM WILL BE WORSE THAN BRITISH IMPERIALISM
PHASE 1:AFTER INDEPENDENCE TO TILL 1971
CONFLICT AND COORPERATION
PHASE1:
CONFLICT:
USA DIDN'T SUPPORT INDIA'S STAND ON KASHMIR
INDIA DIDN'T VOTE IN FAVOUR OF US RESOLUTION IN UNGA WHICH SOUGHT CHINA AS AGGRESSOR IN KOREAN WAR
INDIA 1ST NON-COMMUNIST COUNTRY TO RECOGNISE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
INDIA KEPT INSISTING ON PERMANENT MEMBERSHIP OF UNSC FOR PRC NOT FOR TAIWAN
INDIA DESPITE US TAKING PRO INDIA STAND IN 1962 AND PL 480:
HAS CONTINUED ANTI AMERICA RHETORIC AND WAS VERY CRITICAL OF US INTERVENTION IN VEITNAM WAR
COOPERATION:
USA TOOK PRO INDIA STAND IN 1962 WAR
USA AGREED TO SEND MILITAY AID TO INDIA IN 1962 WAR BUT THAT TIME CHINA HAS DECLARED UNILATERAL CEASEFIRE
USA HELPED INDIA TO ADDRESS FOOD SECURITY : PL -480
ACC. TO DAIVID MALONE:
US KEPT ON TRYING TO BRING INDIA INTO ITS BLOC
BECAUSE OF GEOSTRATEGIC LOCATION OF INDIA
AND ALSO BECOZ OF INDIA'S LEADERSHIP OF 3RD WORLD
PHASE 2:PHASE OF CONFLICT
US-CHINA-PAKISTAN FORMED AXIS. SO ULTIMATELY INDIA HAD TO GO FOR TREATY OF PEACE AND FREINDSHIP IN 1971 WITH USSR
USSR-INDIA- VIETNAM THAN EMERGED
USA NUCLEAR POLICY IN SOUTH ASIA:
USA DIDN'T WANT NUCLEAR ARMS RACE IN SOUTH ASIA AS IT WILL LEAD TO ARMS STRUGGLE IN WEST ASIA
SO USA BUILT NUCLEAR APARTHIED AGAINST INDIA AFTER POKHRAN 1
EVEN AFTER COLD WAR CLINTON PRESSURIED INDIA TO SIGN CTBT
PHASE 3: SINCE END OF COLD WAR:
ESTRANGE DEMOCRACIES TURNED INTO STRATEGIC PARTNERS NAD SHARES COMMEN VALUES: DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS
REASON FOR CHANGE IN INDIA
ACC.TO HARSH V PANT:
THERE WERE UNIQUE
CONSTELLATION OF FACTORS
SYSTEMATICS:
END OF COLD WAR
RISE OF UNIPOLARITY
POSSIBLE RISE OF CHINA
DOMESTIC:
OPENING OF ECONOMYY
POLITICAL:
RIGHTIST IN INDIA HAVE A PRO WEST APPROACH RATHER TOWARDS NON-ALINGMENT
INDIVIDUALS:
IN USA INDO AMIERCAN COMMUNITY NOT ONLY BECAME RICHEST BUT INFLUENTIAL ALSO
IMPORTANT EVENTS:
OPERATION SHAKTI: 1998
ALSO CALLED
CROSSING THE RUBICON
WHY NUKE TESTING IN 1998:
CALCULATED RISK: USA TOO MUCH PRESSURISING INDIA FOR CTBT..
IF INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY AGREES FOR CTBT IT WOULD LEFT INDIA ALONE UNDER INTERNATIONAL PRESSURE
SO IT BECAME NOW OR NEVER
SINCE US VIEWS INDIA AS A BALANCER AGAINST CHINA
THAN US WON'T MIND A NUCLEAR CAPABLE INDIA
crosssing the rubicon
india able to convince the world that this nuke testing is nott to distrupt the internaional order but to claims its rightful place
it marks shift in india's forgein policy moving towards west:
the inetrnational clout today india has in international affairs it foudation laid by
vajpayye foriegn policy
thus any assesmen of indian forgien policy in post cold war period would be incomplete without vajpaayee 's contribution
STARTING OF STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP
JASHWANT SINGH- STOKE TALBOTT TALKS 1998-2000
TWO COUNTRIES WERE NEGOTIATING FOR INDIA SIGNING CTBT:
HOWEVER IT CULMINATED INTO BEGINNING OF STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP
1999 KARGIL CRIISIS: FIRST TIME US TOOK PRO INDIA STAND AND ASKED PAK TO ACT WITH RESTRAIN...
DIRECT OOYCOME OF TALKS
2000: BILL CLINTON VISIT OF INDIA
RESULTED IN FORMAL STATEMENT ON STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP
2004: BAJPAI VISIT TO USA:
CALLED USA AS INDIA'S NATURAL ALLY
MEETING LED TO DECLARATION ON NEXT STEP IN STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP
NSST INCLUDED: NUCLEAR CIVIL CORPORATION
CORPORATION IN HIGH TECH AND SPACE
INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF RELATIONS:
2005: MANMOHAN SINGH'S VISIT TO USA RESULTING INTO 123 AGREEMENT OR CIVIL NUCLEAR AGREEMENT
BIGGEST MANIFESTATION OF US INDIA STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP.. ALSO THROUGH THIS INDIA GOT WAIVER IN NSG
2010: OBAMA 1ST VISIT TO INDIA
OBAMA HELD THAT
INDIA -US PARTNERSHIP IS MOST DEFINING PARTNERSHIP OF 21ST CENTURY
HILIARY CLINTON:
SECRETARY OF STATE:
HELD THAT INDIA PART OF OBAMA'S BIG PALN
**BIG PLAN: INDIA BECAME ONE OF PILLARS OF OBAMA'S
ASIA'S PIVOT**
USA MAKING STRATEGIC DEBT ON INDIA ..
SO SHE APPEALED
INDIA NOT TO LOOK EAST BUT ACT EAST:
OBAMA IN 2016 BECAME 1ST US PREZ TO VISIT INDIA TWICE
PM: MODI
CALLS US INDIA'S NATURAL GLOBAL PARTNER
PM MODI VISITED US 5 TIMES IN 3 YEARS
MODI MANTRA FOR US:
CHALIEN SAATH SAATH
CONCERNS B/W INDIA AND US:
ECONOMIC
DISPUTE IN INVESTMENT: BIT
IPR
MAKE IN INDIA: HOW IT WILL GO ALONG WITH BUY AMERICAN AND HIRE AMERICAN
INDIA CIVIL NUCLEAR LIABILITY ACT
H1-B VISA
GEO STRATEGIC ISSUES
TRUMPS TAKE ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS AND MULTILATERAL TALKS
US INVOLVEMENT IN AFGHANISTAN
FUTURE OF US-CHINA RELATIONS
TRUMPS TAKE ON
COUNTER TERRORISM AND POLICY VIS A VIS PAKISTAN