COLD WAR

INTRODUCTION:

COLD WAR: THE TERM WAS COINED BY BARNARD BARUCH:

BUT POPULARIED BY WALTER LIPPMEN: WHO WROTE BOOK COLD WAR: TO EXPLAIN STATE OF RELATION B/W USA AND USSR

COLD WAR CAN BE TRACED FROM:

DEFINING FEATURES OF COLD WAR:

WINSTON CHURCHIL FULTON SPPECH:
THAT AN IRON CURTAIN HAS DESENDED FROM STETTIN IN BALTIC TO TRIESTE IN ADRIATIC

IN 1961: CONSTRUCTION OF BERLIN WALL:
WHICH DIVIDED EAST AND WEST GERMANY
WHICH IS CONCRETE MANIFESTATION OF COLD WAR WHICH MEANT BIPOLAR WORLD OR EAST-WEST CONFLICT

SITUATION OF WAR IN HOSTILITY BUT NOT RESULTED IN FULL BLOWN WAR HOT WAR B/W TWO SUPERPOWERS

IT REMAINED COLD WAR BECOZ OF NUCLEAR DETTERANCE

COLD WAR WAS OF GLOBAL SCALE: NONE OF REGION REMAINED UNTOUCHED

HAD NUCLEAR BALANCE GOT OFFSET IT WOULD HAVE LED TO CATASTROHE WW-III

BUT IT WAS NOT ALL COLD:

THERE WERE COLD AND WARM PHASES
LIKE PROXY WARS IN 3RD WORLD COUNTRIES

THERE IS NO BEGINING AND END AS COLD WAR IS MORE OF A IDEOLOGICAL BATTLE BIW CAPITALISM AND SOCIALISM
EVEN PRESENT PHASE OF RELATIONS B/W USA AND RUSSIA CAN BE TERMED AS COLD WAR

NUCLEAR DETTERANCE REMAINED THE CORE FEATURE OF US-RUSSIA RELATIONS

AS TACTICALLY THEY MAY COME TOGETHER BUT STRATEGICALLY THEY ARE CONTENDORS

WAS COLD WAR INEVITABLE:

DETERMINISTIC VIEW:

IT WAS INEVITABLE: BECOZ OF CONFLICTUAL GEOPOLITICAL OBJECTIVES

2ND SCHOOL:

COLD WAR IS TRAIL OF MISUNDERSTANDING,MISINTERPRETATION, MISCALCUALTION, MISOPPORTUNITY

POST RVIONIST SAY BOTH WERE RESPONSIBLE OF COLD WAR

HOWEVER IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO SUGGEST THAT
ROOTS OF COLD WAR LIES IN USA FORIEGN POLICY.. AS WORLD ORDER IS SHAPED BY USA AND OTHER'S SIMPLY RESPOND

US FORIEGN POLICY

USA A SUPERPOWER: BECAUSE OF EXECUTION OF ITS FOEIGN POLICY

US FORIGN POLICY IS NOT BASED ON A RHETORIC BUT A LONG TERM GEOPOLITICAL GOAL

US WORLD VIEW IS EXPRESSED BY DOCTRINE OF MANIFEST DESTINY

TERM WAS 1ST USED BU NEW YORK JOURNALIST IN NEW YORK: JOHN-O -SULIVAN IN 1844

MANIFEST DOCTRINE:

ACC. TO THIS DOCTRINE: USA IS CHOOSEN BY GOD FOR A DIVINE MISSION : FOR EXPANSION OF TERRITORIES OF LIBERTY

IT IS A MANIFEST DESTINY BECOZ IT HAS PROVEN AGAIN AND AGAIN

USA HAS NEVER LOST A WAR , AND LOST BECOZ IT DIDN'T WANT TO WIN

WHAT ARE DETERMINANTS OF US FORIGN POLICY

SOURCE OF STRENGTH OF USA:

COMES FROM ITS LOCATION, RESORCES, ITS TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT
THUS USA IS CONSIDERED AS 2000 POUND GORILLA

IT MEANS A SHOCK THAT CAN DEVASTATE ANY OHER COUNTRY CANBE EASILY ABSORBED BY USA

US CONCERNED ABOUT SECURITY OF LAND AND PEOPLE
AND ANY COUNTRY THAT CAN MILITARILY CHALLENGE TO US MILITARY SECURITY IT IS RUSSIA+

IT IS NOT USA'S INTEREST THAT MORE NO. OF STATE ACCQUIRE NUCLEAR CAPACITIES

TO CONTROL WORLD TRADE IT IS NECESSARY FOR US TO MAINTAIN ITS HEGEMONY ON OCEANS

USA POLICIES TOWARDS OTHER COUNTRIES:

USA KNOW NO SINGLE COUNTRY CAN MILITARILY CHALLENGE USA EXCEPT RUSSIA
BUT RUSSIA WILL NOT BE FOOLISH TO START THE WAR

US HEGEMONY CAN ONLY BE CHALLENGED
WHEN OTHER COUNTRIES PURSUE POLICY OF BALANCING

SO IDEA OF USA IS NOT TO ALLOW:
RUSSIA AND EU NOT TO COME TOGETHER
ISLAMIC COUNTRIES TO COME TOGETHER
CHINA, JAPAN, INDIA, RUSSIA TO COME TOGETHER

SIMILARLY A REGIONAL HEGEMON CAN BE IRRITANT FOR USA

SO USA CHECK HEGEMON BY SUPPORTING WEAKER PARTY:
POLICY OF BAITH AND BLOODSHEDDING
LIKE USING INDIS AND JAPAN AGAINST RISE OF CHINA
SAUDI ARABIS TO BALANCE IRAN

ALSO USA TEND TO CREATE INSTABILITY AROUND THE REGIONAL HEGEMON SO THAT THEY REMAIN ENGAGE:
BUCKPASSING

US FORIEGN POLICY IN POST COLD WAR ERA:

RUSSIA:

POLICY TO STOP RUSSIA GAINING LOST SOVIENT STATUS

CHINA:

USA HAS TRIED TO MAINTAIN ITS STAY CHINA'S NEIGHBOURHOOD: US PRESENCE IN AFGANISTAN AND SYRIA

ISLAMIC COUNTRIES:(MIDDLE EAST)

US OBJECTIVBE HERRE IS PREVENT EMERGENCE OF SOLIDARITY IN THIS REGION
AND KEEP IT UNSTABLE

US DOES THIS BY EXPLOITING SHIA -SUNNI DIVIDE... EARLIER IT WAS IRAQ NOW IT IS SYRIA
OR SAUDI VS IRAN

ALSO UNSTABLE MIDDLE EAST WILL KEEP EUROPE AND RUSSIA ENGAGED

EVOLUTION OF COLD WAR

RUSSIA'S FOREIGN POLICY:

WHETHER IT WAS CZAR, STALIN OR PUTIN: FORIGN POLICY SHAPED BY GEOPOLITICAL FACTORS

ACC. TO ROBER KAPLAN:

LENIN'S FOREIGN POLICY:

HELD THAT COMMUNISM IS NOT SECURE AS SURROUNDED BY CAPITALIST STATE... HENCE SUGGESTED EXPANSION OF COMMUNISM

STALIN FORIGN POLICY:

FAILED TO ASURE WEST ... CHANGED ITS POLICY FROM SOCIALISM IN COUNTRY(TO SECURE ITS REGIME)
TO ESTD. OF A BODY COMINFORM: FOR EXPANSION OF COMMUNISM

RUUSSIA SUFFERS FROM REVENGE OF GEOGRAPHY

RUSSIA DOESN'T HAVE NATURAL DEFENSE

RUSSIA ALWAYS FACED INVASIONS

RUSSIA HAS BEEN BUILDING EMPIRE.. TO CREATE A BUFFER ZONE FOR PROTECTION OF ITS CORE INTEREST

WHAT THE PROB:?

RUSSIA NEIGHNOURHOOD POLICY: SCORCHED EARTH POLICY

FOR RUSSIA IS SAID THAT BEAR'S HUG IS NOT CORMORTABLE

DESTRUCTION OF NEIGHBOURHOOD HABITIATION, AGRICULTURE.. TO INTERUPTT SUPPLIES TO FOREIGN ARMIES

STALIN ALSO ADOPTED POLICYOF SALAMI TACTICS: MEANING SLICING OPPOSITION ONE BY ONE