Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
LIBERAL THEORY OF I.P- II (DEMOCRATIC PEACE THEORY OR REPUBLICAN PEACE…
LIBERAL THEORY OF I.P- II
DEMOCRATIC PEACE THEORY
OR REPUBLICAN PEACE THEORY
GIVEN BY MICHEL DOYLE
HE HELD DEMOCRACIES DON'T GO WAR WITH EACH OTHER
BECOZ IN DEMOCRACY THERE IS FREEDOM OF SPPECH AND EXP
N DEMOCRACY IT PROVIDES OPPORTUNITY FOR GOVT. TO RECTIFY ITS MISTAKE & GO FOR COURSE CORRECTION
IN DEMOCRACY PEOPLE ARE TREATED AS END RATHER THAN MEANS
SO IF WORLD PEACE IF MORE DEMOCRACIES ARE PROMOTED
DEMOCRATIC PEACE THEORY IS HIGHLY CRITICED
BECOZ IT HAS BEEN MISUED BY AMERICAN ESTD. TO PROMOTE
PUPPET REGIME
IN NAME OF DEMOCRACY
BUSH POLICY WAS PROMOTING DEMOCRACY AT GUNPOINT
IT HAS DESTABLIZE AFGANISTAN AND IRAQ AND ULTIMATELY ENTIRE MIDDLE EAST
ALSO US POLICY IN MIDDLE EAST HAS BEEN PARADOXICAL`
ONE HAND USA SUPPORT GULF MONARCHIES
ON OTHER USA TOPPLED SADDAM HUSSAIN REGIME.. NOW TRYING SAME THING IN SYRIA
THOUGH THERE HAVE BEEN NO MAJOR WAR B/W TWO DEMOCRACIES BUT IT HAS BEEN A COINCIDENCE
MULTIPLE FACTOR PLAYED THE ROLE
FOR EG: ECONOMIC INTERDEPNDENCE
CULTURAL HOMOGENITY ETC.
COMPLEX INTERDEPENDENCE
PRESENT INTERNATIONAL SEANARIO:
ERA OF GLOBALISATION : WHICH LED TO EMERGENCE OF GLOBAL THREATS LIKE TERRORISM , CLIMATE CHANGE
SO PRESET WO : THERE IS SITUATION WHERE COUNTRIES ARE FORCED TO LOVE WHOM ONE WOULD LOVE TO HATE
WHY SO :arrow_double_up: ??
BECOZ THERE IS
COMPLEX INTERDEPENDENCE
IT DIFFERS FROM SIMPLE INTERDEPENDENCE... ITS NOT JUST ECONOMIC INTERDEPENDENCE
OTHER DIMENSION LIKE SECURITY, CLIMATE CHANGE ETC ARE ALSO THERE
LIKE IN SECURITY: STATE IS NOT THE ONLY PLAYER.. NON STATE ACTORS
NATIONS ARE COOPERATING AND CONFLICTING AT SAME TIME
NOW IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO CELEBRATE WHEN NEIGHBOURS HOUSE IS BURNING
ACC. TO ROBERT KEOHOME: AND JOSEPH NYE
SO WORLD ORDER IS JUST NOT ANARCHICAL BUT ITS COMPLEX INTERDEPENDENCE
SECURITY ISSUES THOUGH NOT HAS BECOME IRRELEVANT ... BUT ECONOMIC SECURITY DOMINATES MILITARY SECURITY
I.P HAVE BECOME PLURALISTIC ... APART FROM STATE THERE ARE NON-STATE ACTORS ALSO
RELATIONSHIP OF NOT ONLY STRUGGLE BUT COOPERATION ALSO
LIBERAL WORLD ORDER
PRESENT SEANARIO LWO IS GOING THROUGH CRISIS -
AS AT WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM AT DAVOS COUNTRIES HAS EXPRESSED CONCERN OVER GLOBALISATION AND FUTURE OF LWO
IDEA OF LWO GIVEN BY WOODROW WILSON,
COMPONENTS OF LWO
FREE TRADE
FREEDOM OF NAVIAGATION
REPUBLICANISM
INTERNATIONAL ORG.
ESTD. OF RULE OF LAW
PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
EVOLUTION OF LWO : BY JOHN IKENBERRY
LWO 1.0
1ST ATTEMPT WAS MADE AFTER WW1
ACHIEVEMNT ESTD OF LEAGUE OF NATIONS
BUT FAILED AND VERY SOON LED TO WW2
LIBERALS OF THAT TIME WERE BRANDED AS UTOPIANS AND IDEALIST
LWO 2.0
ESTD. AFTER WW2
ACHIEVEMENT: UNITED NATIONS
UNHRC
EU
IMF, WORLD BANK
HOWEVER IT COULDN'T BECOME A WORLD ORDER AS IT GOT LIMITED TO WESTERN WORLD... IT WAS CHALLENGED BY 2ND WORLD AND 3RD WORLD
LWO 3.0
IT EMERGED IN ITS STRONGEST FORM AFTER END OF COLD WAR
ACHEIVEMENT
ESTD. OF WTO
GROWTH OF REGIONAL ORG.
IMMEDIATE PHASE
DESCRIBED BY FRANCIS FUKUYAMA: AS END OF HISTORY
REASON OF CRISIS:
ALTHOUGH LWO HAS BENEFITTED THE LARGEST NO. OF PEOPLE THAN ANY OTHER WORLD ORDER
YET IT HAS BEEN RESISTED BECOZ IT HAS
NOT RESULTED I NTO INCLUSIVE GROWTH
ALSO DEMOCRATIC DEFICT OF INS. HAVE BEEN ANOTHER REASON FOR DISAPPOINTMENT
FAILURE OF WESTERN COUNTRIES TO BRING NECESSCARY REFORMS HAS FORCED COUNTRIES LIKE CHINA. TO BUILT A NEW ORDER- CENTERED AROUND CHINA
BUT MORE RECENTLY IN CRISIS
UK REJECTING EU
PROTECTIONIST POLICIES OF USA.. REJECTING TPP. AND PARIS CLIMATE DEAL
ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISM
ACC. TO ROBERT KAGAN:
LWO HAS BEEN FRAGMENTING UNDER THE PRESSURE OF ECONOMIC STRESS
ACC. TO IAN BREMMER:
WORLD IS GOING THROUGH GEOPOLITICAL RECESSION
AND PRESENT PERIOD IS
NO ORDER PERIOD