Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Rovi (CS Agreement (RT義務 (只能透過AD賣產品, 只能賣給ABUYER, Certification process非強制
…
Rovi
CS Agreement
RT義務
-
-
- Certification process非強制
- rovi只要review, approve apparatus design 是符合附件規格1A1B2.3
- safety ok
-
Report內容
- each Q後30天
- Compliant Device賣給AB的量
- Compliant Device透過AD賣給ABㄉ量
-
- Device: 有incorporate Apparatus
- Authorized Distributor: 與RT簽附件Distributor agreement
- Authorized Buyer: 與Rovi簽有合約
-
-
Pre existing, non-ACP Certified Device
"disabled products"
"附件B的東西"
-
效果
不是Device, Compliant Device
-
代價(RT義務)
不可用附件B model name, model number來 name new Device
-
系爭產品
-
在0608前製造
(Rovi看起來是enable, 但其實是disabled不乾淨)
Rovi仍可主張,對於其而言那仍非是disable, 且其亦無於settle中提到Disable方法/承認disable
Argument
- if Rovi當初知道disabled方法,(也就是黃副總說的有說disable方法給Rovi聽,則可推論rovi就算不承認該disable方法,但最終接受settle以該disable方法disable的附件B
(Rovi相信ㄉ狀況)
則RT證明:
-
-
- 似都應可以Section 2 release any and all claims relating to RT's performace, obligation prior to 0608
- release extend to all claims arising prior to 0608 that RT/Rovi dont know or suspect to exist in their favor (waive and release include unknown/unsuspected claim)
- Section 2提到: RT/ROVI may find out thing different from those which they now know or believe to be true, the release shall be remain in effect.
- Rovi知道disabled方法,但知道其實不成功,後面找碴
-
- 是pre-existing device,已waive and release
Disabled Product在0608後是否
- 可賣?
- 要Report嗎?
-
-
-
- settlement沒有提到"enabled, disabled"的方法
- 只有在pre-existing, non-acp certified device部份提到定義為"the function of which is disabled"