Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

An offender of recidivist drink driving that makes progress in complying…

- - - - Should participation be mandatory?
      - How mandatory participation to the program will help to stop the problem of recidivist drink drivers?
  - - - The costs associated with the CMD program?
      - Who should pay for the implementation of the program?
      - Should taxpayers have to pay for the CMD program
  - - - How is progress to the CMD order measured?
      - What constitutes progress to the program?
  - - - Should rehabilitation be mandatory?
      - Who should be involved in the rehabilitation process of offenders?
      - Deterrence function
      - What approach should be used in the rehabilitation process?
        
        Is a therapeutic approach the most effective in stopping the problem of recidivist drink drivers?
      - How is rehabilitation linked to compliance with the program?
      - When is an offender deemed rehabilitated?
- - - - Taxpayers?
      - Offenders?
      - Tasmanian Government?
- - - - How effective are these rewards in acting as an incentive for offenders?
    - - How effective are these sanctions in punishing offenders for their non-compliance?
- - - - Alcohol Addiction
      - Mental Health Issues