Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Observations (Covert observations (Evaluation (Strengths (Behaviour of…
Observations
Covert observations
-
Evaluation
Strengths
- Behaviour of participants is likely to be natural because they are unaware they are being observed, so there is validity
- Observation is easier because the observer can carry out the study without the participants watching the observer
Weaknesses
- Often not ethical because there is no informed consent; if they aren't carried out in public, they go against ethical guidelines
- Observer can't be helped by ppts as they are unaware the study is taking place
Overt observations
-
Evaluation
Strengths
- Ethical as informed consent can be gained and right to withdraw can be given
- Observers can ask for help to set up the study (e.g where to observe from)
Weaknesses
- Participants know they're being watched so might not act naturally, which doubts validity of the data
- Difficult to carry out as observers would be watched to see what they're doing
Structured
Staged observations normally carried out within an environment in which the researcher has some control (can be naturalistic, overt, covert, participant and non-participant)
Evaluation
Weaknesses
- Situation is set up and is artificial in some ways, suggesting lack of ecological validity
- Possible the situation might be interpreted differently by different ppts so may not be as controlled as might be thought
Strengths
- Set up and can be repeated, results can be compared between observations and reliability is likely
- Can take a long time for some behaviours to occur naturally
Participant observations
A variant of natural observations but the researcher joins and becomes a part of the group to get a deeper insight
Evaluation
Strengths
- Ecological validity as the observation is in the natural setting, including not having a stranger present
- Participant observer likely to gather valid data because the setting is natural and what occurs is also natural
Weaknesses
- Observer may be too involved to record all the data, partly because they can't step back from the situation and partly because they have another role
-
Naturalistic
Studying the spontaneous behaviour of participants in natural surroundings (can be naturalistic, overt, covert, participant and non-participant)
Evaluation
Strengths
- Take place in the natural environment of the ppt = ecological validity
- Gathers in-depth data and detail (difficult using any other research method), data are often qualitative and rich, quantitative data can be detailed
Weaknesses
- Subjectivity as the observer has to choose what to observe and what to record
- Observation is of one group or individual at one moment in time, so data are not generalisable to other people at different times