Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

ARISTOTLE -II (THEORY OF CONSTITUTIONALISM (NO. OF RULARS (NORMAL (WORKS…

- - - - POLITY IS RULE BY MANY BUT NOT BY TOO AMNY
      - RICH DON'T TRUST POOR AND VICE VERSA BUT THEY BOTH TRUST MIDDLE CLASS
      - RICH SUFFER FROM ARROGANCE
        POOR SUFFER FROM IGNORNACE
        SO NEITHER RICH OR POOR ARE IN HABIT OF OBIDENCE OF LAW
      - MIDDLE CLASS HAVE REASON NAD MODERATE WEALTH ALSO
        
        INHERENT MSG IS THAT SOCIETIES HAVING LESS INEQUALITY WILL BE MORE STABLE
  - - - PERVERTED , CORRUPT
    - - ARISTROCRACY:(RULE BY RICH)(LIKE CHINA)
        
        BECOZ OF PASSION AND POWER
        
        OLIGARCHY(LIKE MILITARIILY -BUREAUCRACY IN PAK)
        
        BECOZ OF REVOLUTION :arrow_heading_down:
    - - MONARCHY(PHILOSOPHER KING)
        
        BECOZ OF PASSION AND POWER
        
        TYRANNY(WORST FORM OF GOVT.)
        
        BECOZ OF REVOLUTION :arrow_heading_down:
        
        .
    - - POLITY (RULE BY MIDDLE CLASS)
        
        BECOZ OF PASSION AND POWER
        
        DEMOCRACY(RULE BY POOR- MANY IGNORANT)
        2ND WORSTFORM OF GOVT.
        
        RISE OF DEMAGOGIC LEADER
        
        :arrow_forward:
- - - - THIS IS ILLOGICAL, IF IT EXIST THAN MOST EXPLOTATIVE AND IMPRACTICAL(LIKE PETROL RESORCES IN SAUDI ARABIA: NATURAL RESOURCE BUT MONOPLOY OF MONARCH)
    - - ARIS. SUPPORTS THIS SYSTEM AS GOLDEN MEAN
      - BENEFITS OF INDIVIDUAL OWNERSHIP(PRIVATE PROPERTY)
        
        SPOURCE OF MOTIVATION AND RECOGNITION
        
        MEN OF PROPERTY IS MEN OF REASON
        
        SOURCE OF CHARITY AND GENORSITY
      - COMMEN USE??
        
        EXCESSIVE PROPERTY MAY LEAD TO JEALOUSLY WITH OTHERS SO RICH SHOULD HAVE MODERATE WEALTH
        
        SURPLUS TO BE DONATED
        
        ALSO MAN AS A SOCIAL BEING . SO MUST GIVE PAYBACK TO SOCIETY AS WELL
    - - :arrow_backward: PLATO'S IDEA , ARIS. DOESN'T SUPPORT THIS AS EVERY ONE'S PROPERTY IS NO ONE'S RESPONSIBILTY
- - - - IN WORDS OF PLATO: NO LAW OR ORDINANCE IS MIGHTER THAN PK
      - BUT ARIS. ARGUES IF PK IS BEST THAN RULE OF LAW IS BEST APPLICABLE
        
        AS IT IS UTOPIAN TO FIND PK. EVEN IF WE FOUND PK THAN THERE IS NO GAURENTEE THAT HE WILLNOT ACT WITH PASSION AT ANY TIME
  - - - LAW IS IMPERSONEL
        
        DOEN'T CHNGE ACC. TO A PERSON
      - LAW REPRESENT WISDOM OF AGES IT IS NOT WISE TO CHALLENGE IT IN NAME OF ULTIMATE KNOWLEDGE..
        
        GOOD SHOULDN'T BE SACRIFICED FOR SAKE OF BEST BEST IS UNACHIEVABLE
- - - - UNIVERSAL PASSION FOR POOR & PRIVILEGED
      - CARE;ESSNESS AND CORUPTION OF RULING CLASS
      - STATE VOILATES IMP OF MERIT
      - SUDDEN INFLUX OF FOREIGNERS
      - RIVARLY B/W CLASSES
    - - MONARCHY: FAMILY QUARRELS AND JEALOUSLY
      - OLIGOCRACHIES: POOR WILL CONSPIRE AGAINSR THE RICH
      - DEMOCRACY: RISE OF DEMAGOGIC RULARS
- - - - FUNTION OF JUDICIARY (GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL)
    - - BASIS OF DISTRUTION
        
        DESERT/NEED(SOCIALISTIC PRINCIPLE)
        
        WHAT ONE DESERVES
        
        MERIT (CAPITALIST PRINCIPLE
        
        VALUE OF MERIT DECIDED BY SOCIETY LIKE VALUE TO WORK OF RICKSHAW PULLAR AND TEACHER
        
        ARIS. GAVE PREFRENCE TO THIS
  - - - IT IS UNJUST TO TREAT EQUALS UNEQUALLY
        
        IF PERSONS WITH SAME MERIT ARE TREATED UNEQUALLY.. THAN PERSON MAY TURN AGAINST THE STATE(THIS IS CAUSE OF REVOLUTION)
      - ALSO EQUALLY UNJUST TO TREAT UNEQUALS EQUALLY
        
        IF LESS MERITORIUS GIVEN PREFRENCE OVER MORE MERITOUS . THIS CREATES FEEELING OF INJUSTICE AND MORE MERITORIOUS ONE MAY DO SEDITION
        
        THIS SHOULD NOT BE CONFUSED EITH EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW
        
        AS A PERSON WHO JUSTIFIES SLAVERY HOW CAN PROVISE EQUAL PROTECTION O LAW LIKE THING
        
        EQUAL PROTECTION LAW MEANS LESS MERITTOIRUS PERSON TO ELEVATED TO LEVEL PLAYING FIELD
        
        WHEREAS ARIS. CONCEPT IS LESS MERITIOURS TIO BE DISCARDED AGAINST MOE MERITORIUS AND SHOULD BE SOME OTHERS UITABLE WORK
    - - RATHER IDEA OF JUSTICE SHOULD BE BASED ON JUSTICS AS FAIRNESS(RAWLSIAN IDEA) SO AS TO CREATE A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD