Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
schism: philosophers vs current status of transhumanist technology…
schism: philosophers vs current status of transhumanist technology
basis
technicality/scientific basis
timeframe hypothesized
tech
mainly creating technology in between
hollywood transhumanism
dystopia
morals
religion
playing god
cyborgs' lack thereof
equality
greater rich/poor divide
human race
extinction
superior race
transhumanist/digital terrorism
gray goo
society
superiority?
who
gets them?
what will be peoples' purpose?
issues
philosophical side
extreme pessimism
departure from current trends/occurences
over-scientific analysis of human nature
lack of technological basis
homo sapiens 'orthodoxy'...
no 'overview' perspective: either very specific and centered on one tenet of philosophy/transhumanism or extremely vague and philosophical
philosophical aspects of transhumanism
Nietzsche 'overman'
prometheus
renaissance
How can we understand the world in which we find ourselves? How does the universe behave? What is the nature of reality?….Traditionally these are questions for philosophy, but philosophy is dead. Philosophy has not kept up with modern developments in science, particularly physics. Scientists have become the bearers of the torch of discovery in our quest for knowledge. —Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow