Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Barriers | Opportunities (lack of incentive (building code requires only…
Barriers | Opportunities
No Time (Money)
not planned in design process
not aware of possibilities
no anticipation of problem/neeed
no need
no systematic use
making the model is time consuming
not experience in the tool
Task not performed frequently enough
no motivation to develop skills in the tool
no interoperability with BIM or other modelling platform
Simulation process does not fit the design process
not the right tool
limitation in capabilities and scope of tool
information gap between data needed and data available
Design still evolving/changing
not easily adaptable model
not right tool e.g. parametric tool
Not right level of abstraction/simplification of model
No Demand
building performance have no impact on client's business
Disconnect client-user
Lack of awareness of building performance impact on user
Lack of sense of resposibility
not required by building code or certification
Prescriptive rather than performance-based approach
Lack of promotion for BPS services
Lack of investment in service development
lack of skilled engineers
lack of guidance or self-motivation to learn new skills
lack of training or learning opportunities
lack of awareness of latest development
discrepancy in skills and knowledge between junior and senior engineers
high cost/fee
license of tools
skilled engineers (experienced with BPS tools)
time of the process (model making)
lack of incentive
building code requires only simple calculations
certification methods might not always require BPS
no link between the building performance and the client's business model
lack of awareness of the benefits of BPS
need of BPS not anticipated in time
lack of trust
few validation opportunities
too much uncertainties (due to information gap)
lack of expectation management from the simulation expert
role and responsibilities
responsibility of contractor or consultants depending on contract type
possible shared role for massing and envelop design between engineer and architect
importance of performance factor over other design aspects
process related inefficiency
lack of operability between BPS tools as well as modelling platforms
slow exchange of data and results between design team members (segmented sector)
difference of pace between design changes and simulation feedback
inappropriate tool (user-interface, flexibility, level of detail expected...)
information gap between data needed and data available
improve internal workflow
let other recognize the value of BPS
prove value of BPS
propose new services that enhance the value of BPS
improve external workflow
provide guidance and awareness in BPS development