Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Travel Ban Block 48 (Wrong (Terrorist attacks have been by people from…
Travel Ban Block 48
Wrong
-
Nine-step process is effective. Since Obama, we've not had any foreign terrorist attacks on American soil to date. (Rylie)
If they were lying, they'd have already gotten through and attacked us. (Libby)
-
-
Screening is done internationally w/ homeland's security system cooperating as well. Can't just make it up, and w/o proper documentation, you don't get through. (Rylie)
UDHR rights to seek safety in another country. (Libby) Deserve a chance to show they are good people. Not all are terrorists. Most probably not.
One of those countries is Sweden. They are taking a lot of refugees w/o paperwork b/c they understand they need protection. Many are already doing their part. Why not Americans? (Lex)
travel ban violates 4 articles of UDHR - right to life, liberty and safety. Right to travel to another country to be safe. We should be unselfish and let them in. (Rylie)
-
If we ban these people, they will be more inspired to join ISIS against us. (Ryan)
-
-
Many are making 1000 mile journeys unaccompanied by adults. They are trying to escape the terrorists. (Libby)
-
-
-
Right
-
-
Applicants can lie on their applications to get here as terrorists. No SS#'s from these immigrants. (Halli)
Just b/c we haven't had any attacks yet, it doesn't mean we won't be attacked in the future. (Halli)
-
-
-
If one were a terrorist in the group of immigrants and attacked, this could start a world war. (Halli)
-
America is one of the most hated countries in the world. Why would refugees want to escape to our country w/ a threat? (Halli)
-
How is it okay to put Japanese Americans in camps, but not okay to target Muslims who have attacked us.?