Please enable JavaScript.

Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.

If I am asking who owns the public fishery then WHAT IS OWNERSHIP? (Is…

- - - - I would argue yes as it appears to be accepted by a large number of scholars and practitioners. eg O'Connor (2011, 55): "Although not without its critics, Hohfeld's jural relations model and the associated 'bundle of rights' metaphor has become the dominant understanding of property in the social sciences, and in legal theory.
  - - - Substantive
        
        Modest - property is a bundle of rights to a thing rather than a unified right to a thing (Penner, 1996, 734)
        
        Diasaggregative - "each possible "use" of one's property under the broadest notion of use possible, [is] itself a property right if it can form the subject of a transaction" (Penner, 1961, 734)
      - Conceptual
        
        "The "bundle" is a bundle of criteria for the application of the term "property", which criteria are not to be regarded as necessary and sufficient conditions for applying the term. Accordingly, no subset of the elements of the bundle is found in every instance of property." (Penner, 1996, 738)
- - - - Katz argues that a boundary approach categorises ownership as "nothing more than the space left for use of the thing by the owner once all others are kept out" (282) and that this is insufficient to tell us much about the owner's position (285).
      - In addition, she argues that her agenda setting model of property better explains some of the rules of property law, such as the rule against perpetutities (307-309). She also explains the law of adverse possession in terms of agenda setting, although this does not apply to English law (290-291).
- - - - This focus on social relations and obligations/duties is important for O3 of PhD
      - Lametti argues that objects of property that are of great value "either because of [their] importance to a given society at a given time, because of [their] scarcity, or for some other reason, [are] allocated with certain limitations and duties that will ensure [their] property use" (366). This is based on a responsibility model of property as per Gray and Gray (1998)