Please enable JavaScript.
Coggle requires JavaScript to display documents.
Defences to defamation (Justification - true statement (Innuendo (must…
Defences to defamation
-
Privilege
Absolute privilege
Judicial proceedings - judges, lawyers, witnesses
-
-
-
Executive Communications - ministers, secretary of departments
-
-
-
-
Qualified Privilege
no malic can be present
-
-
Coleman v Keanes shop assistant follow plaintiff to regain goods or payment - not privilege (not to prosecute theft)
-
essence of defence is a duty, legal, social or moral to protect interest
-
E.g. of Duty
-
-
Kirkwood Hackett v Tierney - student received grant for UCD (if didn't repeat), met with UCD President, bursar present - defamatory statements made - privilege applied - duty to make full inquiry into grant -Bursar reciprocal interest
-
-
Newspapers, politicians and public interest
-
Reynolds v Sunday Times - no privilege when commenting upon matters of public interest - rests on duty and interest
-
-
-
-
irrelevant circulation not privileged - accusation of perjury in open court after proceedings ended McKeogh v O'Brien
-
-
-
-
-