:check:importance of contextualisation of women's experiences and need for more questioning (abs, 748, 749) :check: dichotomy of vulnerability and virtuosity when it relates to the env. (abs) :check: dichotomy north/south (abs) :check: women not part of the decision-making (744) :check: Sweden and India (744) tropes: women need special attention because they are super poor, they die most during hazards, women more environmentally conscious (745) :check: problematic "feminisation of poverty" leading to the fallacy that poverty alleviation = gender equality (oversimplification) (746,749) :check: women loose their agency from this fallacy (746) :check: "women die more when they are socioeconomically disadvantaged" as hazards are exacerbators (746) :check: ignore differences between women (747) :check: IMPORTANT to note that these discourses, although flawed, succeed at placing women and gender in the picture when it comes to discussions about env. (747) :check: ""victims into heroines" as they become assigned the role of getting rid of poverty" (which is a problem where a movement actually needs high mobilization) (748) :check: need for a rebuilding from ground up rather than a simple injection of women in the system (749) :check: marginality as a contextual concept